Laserfiche WebLink
� <br /> o.�,. � � � <br /> • � �. ° � � <br /> - � . CITY of ORONO <br /> � . ;. � � <br /> , ti <br /> ��� �G~' RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> `�kEsBOg' . NO. � o � .� <br /> WHEREAS,the contractor proceeded to reconstruct the post and beam foundation <br /> of the structure, re-using the pre-existing posts and beams but reconfiguring them in a manner to <br /> provide a more stable foundation for the structure; and <br /> WHEREAS, the reconfiguration of the foundation is considered as a structural <br /> alteration to the boathouse; and � <br /> WHEREAS,the provisions of Section 10.55,Subd.26(A)allow the continuation of <br /> a nonconforming structure as long as it is not expanded,changed,enlarged or altered in a way which <br /> increases its non-conformity; and � <br /> � WHEREAS, the provisions.of Section 10.55, Subd. 26(B) limit the structural <br /> alterations or additions to any nonconforming structure over its life to not exceed 50 percent of its <br /> . value at the time the structure became nonconforming; and <br /> • WFIEREAS,the provisions of Section 10.55,Subd.26(E)prohibit the reconstruction <br /> . of any nonconforming structure which has been destroyed to an extent of 50%or more of its assessed <br /> value, except in conformity with the provisions of Section 10.55; and <br /> `VHEREAS,the City has determined that the boathouse became nonconforming on <br /> 7anuary 1, 1975 and had an estimated value at that time of approximately$1,200; and <br /> WHEREAS, the value of the work done by the contractor in relation to the <br /> foundation of the boathouse was declared by the applicant to be $505, as witnessed by an invoice <br /> for such work presented by the applicant at the July 14,2003 Council meeting. <br /> NO`V, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, � <br /> Minnesota: <br /> FINDINGS <br /> 1. The City Council finds that the boathouse was not expanded, chanjed, enlarged or <br /> altered in any way which would increase its nonconformity. . <br /> 2. The City Council finds that the boathouse by virtue of its temporary relocation during <br /> renovation was not `destroyed' as that term is used in 10.55, Subd. 26(E). <br /> • �� <br /> � Page 2 of 4 . <br />