Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning File #1307 <br />Page 2 of 2 <br />Review Exhibits C and D. The applicants plans now show a deck that does <br />not exceed 165 s.f. of area. The stairs have the appropriate number of <br />risers within the 12 foot intervals. Applicant has reduced the amount of <br />additional hardcover by employing the gravel area of the retaining wall <br />landings requiring only one deck stair 3' 6" by 3' 3". In addition, review <br />Exhibit F, the building inspector has reviewed the revised plans submitted <br />by the applicant and has approved them finding that they meet all <br />requirements of the state building code. <br />As the majority of the Planning Commission have conceptually approved the <br />proposed reconstruction of a deck, access stair, and shed within the <br />Scanlons lakeshore yard, staff will repeat some of the suggested findings <br />from an original staff memo dated June 1, 1988 if application was to be <br />approved. <br />A. The applicant has reduced hardcover with the new proposal for the <br />improvements within the lakeshore yard and within the 75-250, setback <br />area. <br />B. The existing structures were removed as a result of a severe <br />storm that eroded the lakeshore bank and had nothing to do with the <br />improper maintenance of the subject structures. <br />C. There have been no substantial changes in the code since 1975 <br />when the LR districts and lakeshore standards were established. <br />D. The City had approved similar variances for the property in <br />1978. <br />E. The steep topography requires special consideration for the <br />residents of the property. <br />F. The applicant's physical limitations as documented by his <br />personal physician's report would prevent his full enjoyment of his <br />lakeshore property if the deck and shed were not restored to lakeshore <br />yard. <br />The following conditions are also recommended with the approval of this <br />application: <br />1. Run-off from the roof of the shed must be directed away from the <br />grade level of the retaining wall and drained to a drainage structure <br />already within the retaining wall substructure or via an independent <br />drainage tile. This will prevent any undermining of the existing <br />retaining wall structure. <br />2. Plantings must be provided adjacent to each of the retaining wall <br />levels to provide the necessary screening and ground cover <br />stablization. <br />3. The applicant has agreed to remove 157 s.f. of existing hardcover <br />within the 75-250' setback area. Such hardcover removals must be <br />completed by <br />Please advise staff if additional information is required or if you have <br />any questions concerning the new material submitted by the applicants prior <br />to the meeting. <br />