Agenda Packet Cc - regular meeting 7/25/1988

Home Browse Search

Zoning File #1207 July 21, 1988 Page 2 of 3 75-250' Setback Area = 9,600 s.f. Allowed 2,400 s.f. or 25% Existing = 4,200 s.f. or 43.7% Proposed = 4,043 s.f. or 42.1% (removal of 157 ::. f., 52.5 s.f. adjacent to acce stairs at rear of house, .nd 105 s.f. located at northeast corner of residence - see Staff's sketch, Exhibit N) Please note,185 s.f. of additional hardcover to be removed within applicants' lakeshore yard has not been included in the above calculations because they were not included in the original hardcover calculations totaling 4,200 s.f. Review of Application - The applicants commenced the review of the application sometime in the fall of 1987, but because of the ill health of Mr. Scanlon, they asked for the tabling of the review until this spring. Planning Commission considered this application at their June 6th, June 20th, and July llth meetings. The difficulties throughout the 3-meeting review dealth with information that conflicted with what was being proposed by the applicants or a request on the part of the Planning Commission that the Building Inspector confirm the proposed layout of the access stairs in relation to the deck underneath shed. Please review Exhibits F, O, & P. The Inspector has confirmed no problems with the design of the access stairs nor of the deck. Note, applicants have employed use of the graveled surface of the retaining wall levels and reduced the need for deck safety landings, there- by reducing the need for additional hardcover. Upon the third review, the applicants had satisfied all of the Planning Commission's requests and need for additional information or amended plans. Staff drafted a recommendation of approval based on the conceptual direction of the Planning Commission at their June 20th meeting. The recommendation was adopted by the majority opinion of the Planning Commission as setforth in the staff memo of July 12th (attached to this memo). Please note, the Planning Commission established the date of June 30th, 1989 for the removal of tl:e 157 s.f. of hardcover within the 75-250' setback area. The enclosed resolution has been drafted per the Planning Commission recommendation. The minority Minion of one denied the application finding no valid hardship that would all.cw the recons+:ruction of the structures within the lakeshore protector area and noted the Ci-y has never recognized the grandfather standai.' -)efe-e and should not establish such a precedent.