Laserfiche WebLink
53188.6 <br />/G <br />TO: Mayor and City Council <br />PROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administratovp <br />DATE: May 25, 1988 <br />SUBJECT: Zoning Ordinance Amendment - Sign Ordinance <br />Attachment: A. Zoning Ordinance Chapter 10.61 <br />B. Proposed Draft Language <br />ISSUE - Determination as to whether the Council wants to refer <br />the draft language in Attachment B to the Planning Commission for <br />consideration and changes in the sign ordinance. <br />INTRODUCTION - A review of the zoning ordinance, as it relates to <br />signs, has shown it has a number of weaknesses. Two of these <br />weaknesses recently of concern are the types of signs that are <br />allowed in residential areas together with the length of <br />temporary signs. While there is a 90 day permit applicants can <br />continue to have 90 day permits without any limit as to how often <br />a permit can be renewed. <br />DISCUSSION - As a result of the issues raised in the zoning <br />F.-ccTinance chapter the following draft language has been prepared <br />to address the two issues above plus other related issues in the <br />zoning chapter at this point. It is recommended that the samples <br />attached also be reviewed in the context of this draft language <br />to see if there are other issues that Planning Commission would <br />like to consider in amending the sign ordinance. <br />ALTERNATIVES - <br />1. Refer to the Planning Commission. <br />2. Amend and refer. <br />3. Table. <br />4. Take no action. <br />RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended that this be referred to the <br />Planning Commission for them to undertake the necessary ordinance <br />amendments applir:�hle to signs for their review an3 <br />recommendation. <br />PROPOSED MOTION - MovCu by y, seconded by , that Attachment 3 <br />be referred to the Planning Commission for their review and <br />recommendation. Ayes , Nays __ <br />-7 - / g <br />7-0 <br />. �po� E•h� - • 6 `O <br />