Laserfiche WebLink
Ali <br />To: Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members <br />City Administrator Bernhardson <br />r" r <br />From: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administ'rattil�J <br />Date: July 8, 1988 <br />Subject: i1103 Howard F. Eisinger, 3245 Wayzata Boulevard - <br />Request to Extend Conditional Use Permit - Resolation t2192 <br />Section 10.09, Subdivision 8 Conditional Uses: Lapse of Permit. A <br />conditional use permit shall lapse one year following the date on <br />which it became effective, unless prior to that time a building permit <br />is issued by the Building Inspector and construction is commenced and <br />pursued toward completion on the site which was the subject of the <br />conditional use permit application. A conditional use permit may he <br />renewed for an additional period of one year provided that the request <br />be filed prior to the expiration of one year from the date when the <br />use permit is filed with the Zoning Administrator. The Council may <br />grant or deny an application for renewal of a conditional use permit. <br />List of Bxhibits <br />Exhibit A - Eisinger's Letter Dated June 27, 1988 <br />Exhibit B - US Fidelity and Guaranty's Letter Dated July 1, 1988 <br />Exhibit C - Staff's Letter Dated July 5, 1988 <br />Exhibit D - Resolution No. 2192 <br />The City is in receipt of a letter from Howard Eisinger dated June <br />27th, 1988 requesting an extension of conditional use permit, Resolution <br />No. 2192, reviewed wy the City as Application #1103. Mr.. Eisinger's <br />application involved extensive filling of his property. Fill was to be <br />obtained from the I-394 improvements. Park Construction Company was to <br />conduct the filling and grading activities. It was Park Construction <br />Company that provided the required bond to assure completion of the project <br />once begun, or at least the final grading and seeding if the filling could <br />not be completed. <br />On July 5th, 1988, the City received a letter from the bonding company <br />asking for the City to release the bond. Staff advised the bonding company <br />of Mr. Eisinger's recent request and that staff would be presenting Mr. <br />Eisinger's request before the Council at their July llth, 1988 meeting. <br />In reviewing Resolution No. 2192, there appeared to be no change from <br />the normal conditions of approval that would establish a specific <br />expiration date, one year from the date of Council approval. Section <br />10.09, Subdivision 8 of the Conditional Use Permit Code states that the <br />applicant must file a request for extension prior to the expiration date. <br />Mr. Eisinger may have called staff to ask about potential of an extension, <br />uut staff cannot recall anything specific at this point. Ir staff was <br />contacted, staff would have ha. to advise the applicant to make a formal <br />request for an extension in writing irior to the expiration date. <br />