Laserfiche WebLink
Page 3 of 6 <br />Restoration <br />on building Lakeshore' <br />Existing <br />Approved/ <br />Property <br />Area <br />Envelope Non -Lakes`: re <br />Structures <br />Denied <br />LaPresh - <br />5,300 s.f. <br />Narrow lot depth, Lakeshore <br />Cabin (haz bldg) <br />Denied <br />Apt 1. #999 <br />LR-IC <br />excessive lakeshore <br />assessed for sewer <br />6-23-86 <br />21,780 s.f. <br />and wetland setbacks, <br />and water but not <br />required <br />witn ^mounty road right- <br />connected. Total <br />of -way increased next <br />replacement. <br />to bridge. <br />Perberton - <br />11,130 s.f. <br />Narrow lot depth, Lakeshore <br />Existing residence <br />Apprcved <br />ApHi, 0983 <br />I>R-1C <br />75' lakeshore setback <br />hooked to sewer. <br />1-13-86 <br />21,780 s.f. <br />on both east and west. <br />Total replacement. <br />required <br />Heintz <br />8,300 s.f. <br />Narrow lot depth with Lakeshore <br />Undeveloped. Not <br />Denied <br />LR-113 <br />total of 1001- multiple, <br />assessed for sewer <br />3-16-78 <br />43,560 s.f. <br />excessive variances required <br />Never assessed as <br />required <br />for .e;idence. <br />buildable lot based <br />on market valuation. <br />Euhject <br />5,500 s.f. <br />Narrow depth of Lakeshore <br />Undeveloped. Not <br />Property <br />LR-1C <br />building envelope - <br />asses>ased for sewer <br />21,780 s.f. <br />multiple variances required <br />and water- Neve, <br />required <br />to construct residence - <br />assessed as buildable <br />major portions of proterty <br />lot, based on market <br />consist of wetlands. <br />valuaticn. <br />In addition, staff has reviewed the assessed market valuations for all <br />seven parcels, they have been listed for your consideration below: <br />Parcel <br />188 <br />187 <br />•P" <br />185 <br />'84 <br />'83 <br />182 <br />181 <br />180 <br />'79 <br />178 <br />0003 <br />600.00 <br />6C0.00 <br />600.00 <br />600.00 <br />600.00 <br />550.)0 <br />500.00 <br />440.00 <br />360.00 <br />330.1i0 <br />300.00 <br />0009 <br />100.^0 <br />100.00 <br />100.U0 <br />100.00 <br />100.00 <br />110.0) <br />100.00 <br />60.00 <br />40.00 <br />r0 <br />50.00 <br />0010 <br />100.00 <br />100.00 <br />100.00 <br />100.U0 <br />100.00 <br />50.00 <br />50.00 <br />30.00 <br />20.00 <br />:.00 <br />30.00 <br />0011 <br />100.00 <br />100.00 <br />100.00 <br />100.00 <br />100.00 <br />50.00 <br />50.00 <br />30.00 <br />40.00 <br />30.00 <br />50.00 <br />0012 <br />100.00 <br />100.00 <br />10L.00 <br />100.00 <br />100.U`-, <br />50.00 <br />50.00 <br />30.00 <br />50.00 <br />40.00 <br />40.00 <br />'013 <br />100.00 <br />100.00 <br />100.00 <br />100.00 <br />100.00 <br />110.00 <br />100.00 <br />60.00 <br />40.00 <br />30.00 <br />50.00 <br />014 <br />300.00 <br />300.00 <br />'100.00 <br />300.00 <br />300.00 <br />270.00 <br />250.00 <br />140.00 <br />100.00 <br />80.00 <br />70.00 <br />The parcels have never been assessed as buildable lots. Parcel 0003 has <br />been assessed for lateral sewer and a water unit, but the subject parcels <br />have never been assessed for sewer or water (0013 and u014). <br />Staff Recommelnuation <br />To recommen, 'enial of the lot area variance application of Merritt <br />Peterson and Rick 5todola .used on the following findings: <br />1. There is only approximately 5,500 s.f. of area within the defi:._a <br />buildinev envelope with an average approximate de, ' of 100'. <br />2. There is not adequate area to build a house and Meet --he 75' <br />setback requirement, tht front, rear and side yard setbacks and <br />hardcover recr,iletions. <br />3. The �erty has never been assessed for sewer or water. <br />4. The tr rty was valued for tax purposes in the past at A reduced <br />amount t fleet the fact that these are substandard lots, and not <br />appropri :or residential construction. <br />5. The Lot is subject to flooding and s in the natur4 ,.,mgeway <br />to the lake for the surrounding waters-.- I. There is nc to buila <br />on the property without diverting the surface water off in a <br />manner contrary to the normal run-off pattern and onto the adjacent <br />street. Any construction would be subject to periodic `looding. <br />5. The proterty is substandard in size and relation ,rip to other <br />lots in the area upon which development has already been compleeed. <br />7. The granting, c. lc t area ---iri ance for these properties would <br />result in additional: <br />