My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - City Council - regular meeting 6/27/1988
Orono
>
City Council
>
1988
>
Agenda Packets - City Council - regular meeting 6/27/1988
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/8/2025 1:29:23 PM
Creation date
9/8/2025 1:04:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Administration
Admin Doc Type
Agenda Packets - City Council
Section
City Council
Subject
regular meeting
Document Date
6/27/1988
Retention Effective Date
9/8/2025
Retention
Permanent After File Date
Protection
Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
622
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JUNE 13, 1988 <br />NOODHILL AVENUE CONTINUED <br />Orchard Road and felt the road improvement would be of <br />no benefit to him and should not have to share in the <br />costs for the improvement. <br />There were no other comments from the public and the <br />public hearing was closed. <br />It was moved by Acting Mayor Callahan, seconded by <br />Councilmember Sime, that the Council approved the <br />project for Woodhill Avenue to be undertaken; and accept <br />the bid. Motion, Ayes 2, Nays 2. Councilmembers <br />Goetten and Peterson voted nay. Motion tied. <br />it was movt,,' by Acting Mayor Callahan, seconded by <br />Councilmember Sime, to table the matter until the July <br />11, 1988 Council meeting. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 1. <br />Councilmember Peterson voted nay. Motion carried. <br />Councilmember Sime noted the improbability of getting a <br />4/5's vote on this issue at the July llth meeting. <br />r7herefore, he recommended that the matter be held in <br />abeyance until the July 25th meeting. <br />Council felt that tabling the matter further would not <br />necessarily guarantee obtaining a 4/5's vote. <br />City Administrator Bernhardson also noted that the bids <br />would expire by the July 25th meeting. <br />Councilmember Goetten noted the history of two nay votes <br />throughout this issue and felt this outcome should have <br />been anticipated. <br />City Administrator Bernhardson stated it was his <br />understanding that the opposition was mainly on the <br />assessment to the abutting property owners and not <br />necessarily against the project being undertaken. <br />Councilmember Peterson asked how -ide Woodhill Avenue <br />currently is and technically what width should the road <br />be? <br />City Engineer Cook stated that the road is currently <br />16' or 18' wide. The road should be at least 20' wide. <br />but it is recommended to build roads 24' wide because <br />of the tendancy for the side of the pavement breaking <br />up. <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.