06-27-1988 - Agenda Packet City Council - regular meeting

Home Browse Search

Additional Cos ents and Planning Cos ission Recos endation Exhibit I - Staff Inspection Report Planning Commision advised the applicant that the structure would have to be altered because they could not approve the encroachment of the structure over the rear lot line. The Escher advised that the existing structure could be altered approximately 21. Escher advised the Planning commisisen that the structure could be altered at least 2' based on the location of the foundation pier. Planning Commission then approved a 1'6" setback from the rear lot line requiring the 816" variance setback for the total structure. Subject to the required installation a fire wall along the rear lot line for being constructed within the structure. Staff asked the Building Staff to go out and confirm the width of the maximum alteration allowed based on the location of the pier footing. Staff confirmed that it could only be altered 1'6". Approving a 116" alteration of the structure would require now a 9' variance or 90% rear setback variance. Staff has reviewed below the various alternatives of action available to the Council. 1. Approval of Planning Commission recommendation - subject to staff confirmation based on minimal alteration required to retain the pier foundation. Required = 10' Proposed - l' Variance = 9' or 90% 2, Alter structure to meet a minimum 3' setback requiring alteration of the existing Fier footing. Structure would now be 416" in width. Required - 10' Proposed - 3' Variance = 7' or 70%. Applicants may not find a shed with 4 1/2' width satisfactory for the proposed use. It should also be noted that the fir, wall would be required along the side of the structure that abuts tte rear lot line (fire wall required for structure legs than 5' from a lot line). 3. To recommend denial of a rear setback variance for an attached storage shed to the existing garage structure and to recommend that storage shed addition be attached to garage along the west side .neeting the required 10' setback from the roar lot line. Applicant may wish to construct a dettached shed that may be placed 5' from the rear lot line and 10' from the side lot line. The required rear setbacks are met there is no need to construct a fire wall a for 4 the rear of the new structure. Council Action To give staff conceptual direction so that the ap, ropriate resolution can be drafted for action at the July 11, 1988 Council meeting.