06-27-1988 - Agenda Packet City Council - regular meeting

Home Browse Search

COMM, 10 JUN 27 13i:,3 To: Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members CITY OF ORONO City Administrator Bernhardson From: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Date: May 31, 1988 Subject: #1283 Gary and Beth Escher, 3556 Livingston Avenue - After the Fact Variance - Public Hearing Zoning District - LR-lC Total Area - 13,200 s.f. or .3 Acres (.5 Acre Required) Pertinent Ordinances - Section 10.61, Subdivision 5 (A) Applicant seeks rear setback variance approval for newly constructed shed attached to existing detached garage, constructed without a building permit. Attached shed becomes part of garage and is not subject to Section 10.03, Subdivision 15 (E) that would allow a 5' setback from rear lot line for all other accessory structures. Rear Setback Variance Allowed = 10' Proposed -.5' or 110% Original Shed = -.5 + or - 110% Section 10.03, Subdivisio1, 15 (F) Side yard setbacks Required-10' Proposed - 10.5' - No variance side setback required. Original Shed - 21+ (8' or 80% side setback variance) (review Exhibit F). Review of Bardeover (500-1000' setback area) Total area - 13,200 Allowed Hardcover - 4,620 or 35% Existing - 4,122 or 31.2% (This includes original storage building 8' by 301, hardcover excluding original shed = 3,882 s.f. or 29.4%. Proposed - 4,122 s.f. or 31.2% (No change in hardcover) List of Rzhibits Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Property Owners List Exhibit C - Plat MaE Exhibit D - Addendum Exhibit E - Staff Sketch Exhibit F - Applicant's Sketch Exhibit G - Survey Exhibit H - Ebert Acknowledgement Form Review of Application - The new 8' by 30' shed was constructed by the applicant early this year without the benefit of a building Eermit review. Please review Exhibit D, the applicant's addendum that sites the background and the reasons why applicant did not feel a building Eermit was required in this case. 'rhe original shed that was attached to the rear of the