Laserfiche WebLink
City of ORONO <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />NO. _/� 77 <br />of this application, the City Council hereby extends the <br />deadline for reopening of the business to not later than <br />June 15, 1982. <br />15. The applicants hereby agree that they have no vested property <br />rights to continue commercial use of the premises except <br />in strict accordance with the terms and conditions of this <br />resolution, and that the City may impose additional conditions <br />as may be needed in the future in order to protect the public <br />health, safety and welfare. Applicants further agree to <br />waive any rights to object to such other conditions if after <br />a complete and full hearing the City Council determines that <br />such condition is necessar•!, to protect the public, health, <br />safety, and welfare. <br />16. fused upon the findings of fact in this case, including <br />the findings of Resolution No. 1239 and No. 1271, the <br />City Council hereby declares that they would have denied <br />this current application except for the promises made <br />by the applicants that they would strictly adhere to the <br />conditions and limitations set forth herein, and further <br />the Council declares that this application and conditional <br />use permit shall be denied and will be considered to be <br />invalid unless all the terms and conditions of this resolution <br />are complied with. This declaration is made for one or <br />more of the following reasons: <br />a) Any other commercial use or any increased or expanded <br />commercial use would not be consistent with the prior <br />existing non -conforming use as documented in the 1968 <br />conditional use permit for Mayona Sundlin, and therefore <br />such use would constitute a "use" variance as prohibited <br />by Minnesota Statutes 462.357 Subd. 6 (1). ,r <br />b) Removal or elimination of the prior existing residential J <br />occupancy would likewise constitute a prohibited "use" <br />variance. <br />c) Failure to correct the listed building code and fire <br />code violations would be a direct health and safety hazard <br />to the public. <br />d) Failure to correct the failing septic system would <br />constitute a direct pollution and health hazard to the <br />public. <br />Page 13 of 15 <br />