Laserfiche WebLink
 The parking lot down the middle of the park. Location of the south ballfield, the balls will be <br />hit towards Willow. <br /> Parking lot feels like it takes up so much more of the park - lots of nonporous space. Cuts the <br />park in half. <br /> massive field and massive parking leave no room for trees and shrubs; parking splits the park <br />in half <br /> I do not like the parking or fields. <br /> Don't get rid of green space for vehicles. Find a better solution. <br /> Waste way to much natural/green space with parking. Only has 2 bball fields. Only has one <br />parking entrance/exits, which will be a disaster on Willow <br /> Parking lot should have a second entrance on the opposite end to help with traffic flow. Looks <br />like it would get very congested with one entrance/exit. <br /> Parking lot in middle of park raises new safety concerns with park visitors needing to traverse <br />the parking lot to get to the restroom from the multi-use field; only one baseball field <br /> Having to cross parking lot to use other half. <br /> Could cars also exit from the other side of the field? Hackberry Hill is a less busy street than <br />Willow. <br /> To big of parking lot, takes away from park use. <br /> The parking lot, while spacious, it could have entrance/exit from hackberry on the west. <br /> Only 1 ballfield and parking between the fields <br /> Uses a large part of grass for parking lot, lose a baseball field <br /> Orono does not need another softball filed and this is not what the Citizens wanted. They <br />need TWO t-ball fields for the league. <br /> Kicks little kicks out, invites older kids and possible weekend games. It’s not what this land/ <br />neighbors can support or want. T ball needs more fields not soccer and softball <br /> Only one ball field and the restrooms/shelter too close to neighbors' homes. There is a <br />concern about late night gatherings after park hours (teens). <br /> Loss of second ball field. Parking eats a ton of space. <br /> Only one baseball field. <br /> No — I do not support the plan for just one field. There is far too much parking proposed for <br />only one field. Orono Baseball is incredibly important to this community. Keeping two fields <br />is essential. Without two fields, the large parking lot becomes unnecessary and a waste of <br />valuable space - people just squatting. This park should prioritize space for sports and <br />activities — not excess parking. We have seen the OBO numbers go up 20%! We need the <br />fields. <br /> Limits number of teams for all sports looking to use the space. So there's a part of me that <br />dislikes that is is the easiest. <br /> Would be hard to lose a baseball field! Also not a fan of the storm water pond. If this is a <br />requirement for run off water, what will the city do to block it off from young kids and control <br />mosquitoes? <br /> Losing a baseball field feels like a non starter <br /> It had less playing fields. <br /> Is there only one multiuse area? <br /> The outfield needs a fence to keep balls out of swamp area and off willow. <br /> Part of the sledding hill is blocked by ball field/benches <br /> Make sure sledding lane is free of obstacles <br /> <br />18