Laserfiche WebLink
 Lots of field options <br /> Again storm water pond addresses long standing drainage issues. Two baseball fields that <br />look appropriate for 10u players. There is a strong need for this type of field space. <br /> This seems to be the design that is the least disruptive to the park's current design IF the field <br />at the corner of Elm and Hackberry could be turned so home plate is next to the parking lot <br />area. The neighbors that attended the open house agree with that as well. Also having the <br />restrooms on Willow will be more convenient for utility workers and locals who use the <br />current Biffy on a regular basis. <br /> The large green space is maintained. The large pond at the entrance along Willow, the trees <br />lining Willow. The ball infield locations on opposite ends will provide space for spectators <br />without feeling cramped. The parking lot looks easy to enter and exit during busy peak game <br />times. Playground and basketball is away from parking lot and moving vehicles. <br /> Extra shade <br /> The line of trees along the main road, the ability to fit more fields <br /> Storm water drainage <br /> <br />Concept B: What do you dislike about the design? <br />Open-Ended Response <br /> <br /> Nothing <br /> Nothing <br /> Not that much. Best design out of the 3 by a landslide. <br /> The whole layout is no goid <br /> Too busy <br /> Seems complicated <br /> To congested <br /> Feels super busy. I don’t like the water right behind where parents would likely sit and <br />constantly have to be keeping an eye on younger children-better when the water is in the <br />outfield. Also balls would be coming towards the playground area then too. <br /> The field design appears confusing and is not a good layout <br /> Doesn’t flow well and, again, trying to pack too much into too little space. <br /> Ball fields and multi use can't be used at the same time <br /> Soccer field seems a bit strange being diagonal <br /> Appears unrealistic given the slope. It's a lot of fill or retaining wall to make those center <br />fields playable. <br /> Seems harder to schedule multiple events, but I'm not sure how the seasons align so that may <br />not be an issue. <br /> Why take away both ball fields for soccer? Soccer and baseball can happen simultaneously in <br />option A <br /> I think the mixed use field space is going to be challenging to realize with the existing grade. <br />There will likely need to be retaining walls adding cost. <br /> Massive amount of grading cut/fill will be required. SE dugout will encourage kids messing <br />with the pond. <br /> parking is taking up too much green space <br /> Parking spaces are not a good idea. Keep our green spaces and find a better solution. <br /> Parking looks to be safer, large fields with plenty of room. <br /> Parking is off to one side. <br />14