Laserfiche WebLink
##683 Doug DeMalignon <br />Page 2 <br />Variance <br />Is there a point at which all structural expansion must be <br />curtailed on substandard sites with severely limited septic <br />areas? Must all expansion for some properties be restricted <br />until serves py sewer. If you are to make a recommendation of <br />denial, you must make findings that will prove the proposal to <br />be potentially detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare. <br />If the application is to be approved, you may consider the <br />following: <br />To approve an P' x 30' addition involving expansion of an existing <br />bedroom and livingroom to the principal structure at 1380 Arbor <br />Street based on the followinq findings and hardships: <br />1 - No additional land available. <br />2 - Established residence for over 50 years. <br />3 - Expansion will create no additional demands on existing <br />substandard septic system. <br />4 - The proposed improvements will have no negative effect <br />on the public health, safety and welfare. <br />approval is subject to the following conditions: <br />1 - Existing drainfield must be staked and protected during <br />construction. <br />2 - Owner is placed on notice that based on the substandard <br />lot area and inability to expand septic system, the City <br />will not approve any future expansion of the principal <br />structure. <br />