My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-09-2025 PK Agenda - special
Orono
>
Park Commission
>
2025
>
09-09-2025 PK Agenda - special
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2025 12:52:27 PM
Creation date
9/5/2025 12:51:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
x Minutes and Agendas
Minutes or Agenda
Agenda
Meeting Date
9/9/2025
Board
Park Commission
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Seems like most parking <br /> Best parking option. Bathroom in central location <br /> Parking lot in middle of park. Encouraging parking in the lot more than on the road. <br /> Everything except the parking spaces. <br /> This offers a lot of parking, but I’m afraid it does it at the expense or removing playing fields. <br /> Favorite design of the 3. Best parking and use of fields seems better for multiple sports at one <br />time. <br /> Easiest and safest, multi sports on the same night <br /> Good separation of multi use and ball field. Could successfully play multi games. Nice <br />restroom location. Parking off main road <br /> Mix use design. Playground and open space available which is consistent with mix use parks in <br />the area <br /> Preferred Design Good separation between playing fields Efficient parking Good restroom <br />location Eliminates need for perimeter sidewalk and allows for trees around periphery <br />Spectators don’t have to stand along a street <br /> This is my vote! I like that the baseball field is clearly distinguished from the multi use field. <br /> Clean design, parking spots look maximized and the shelter area off the park and the fields is <br />nice. <br /> Less congested <br /> Less crowded with one ballfield. Having the open field on the north end. <br /> Nice and tidy….dont need 2 baseball fields so C is best i think. <br /> The soccer leaves the baseball alone. <br /> Large grass infield baseball diamond can be used by older players. If not grass infield, then <br />nothing positive. <br /> The shelter and bathrooms are near the playground. <br /> Bathroom near playground More parking with access to all fields <br /> Lots of centrally located parking and bathroom. Big soccer field <br /> Restroom proximity to basketball and infield. All the trees around the whole park is great for <br />shade, buffer, and water drainage. The large multiuse field looks good for soccer, flag <br />football, lacrosse, fairs or community events, fitness classes or bootcamps, summer camps. <br /> Local of restroom <br /> I like the sidewalks/walking paths throughout the park and where the restrooms and shelter <br />are located. The parking lot separating the field areas is also nice. <br /> <br /> <br />Concept C: What do you dislike about the design? <br />Open-Ended Response <br /> <br /> Nothing. Great design <br /> Nothing. <br /> Nothing <br /> All the things <br /> Doesn’t feel like it’s making the most use out of the space <br /> My least favorite of the three designs. Too much paved parking. <br /> I don’t like that you have to pass through a parking lot to get from one field to the other. <br />17
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.