Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MAY 23, 1998 <br />PUBLIC COMMENTS CONTINUED <br />be brought to Council on June 13th, if staff has <br />the title opinion and the mylars. <br />ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT: <br />11222 JAN WAYS <br />1885 CONCORDIA STREET <br />AFTER THE FACT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT <br />RESOLUTION #2433 <br />Applicant Phyllis Waye was present for this matter. <br />City Administrator Bernhardson stated this <br />application is an after -the -fact conditional use <br />permit for installation of various items to retain <br />a fairly steep bank after the July 23rd storm. The <br />restoration consists mainly of large boulders set <br />into the landscape plus rip -rap. <br />Mrs. Waye requested that the completion date be <br />changed due to the fact that some of the materials <br />are not available at this time and because of the <br />complexity of the work. <br />It was moved by Councilmember Sime, seconded by <br />Mayor Grabek to adopt Resolution #2433 amending <br />Item ►7 to read, resotration shall be completed by <br />a date to be determined by staff. Mction, Ayes 5, <br />Nays 0. <br />11129 TODD WATERS <br />3961 CASCO POINT ROAD <br />REQUEST TO AMEND COUNCIL DIRECTIVE. <br />OF RESOLUTION #2292 <br />Mr. Waters was present for this matter. <br />City Administrator Bernhardson so-ated this is a <br />request by Mr. Waters to erect a retaining wall to <br />maintain a walkout without having to go back and <br />raise the house and redo the basement waI 1 in order <br />to eliminate the walkout. The retaining wall would <br />be out from the foundation wal 1 8 feet and out as <br />far as the original house line. This was tabled at <br />the last Council meeting on a 4-1 vote. Related to <br />this matter is Item #14 on tonight's agenda, which <br />is the fe3sibi: :y report of the storm water <br />ponding. There -r a three options presented by <br />Engineer Cook. _he first option was the re- <br />installation of the current 8 inch pipe. This <br />would necessitate an overflow put in across an <br />abutting property owners yard. option 2 is the <br />installation of 10 inch pipe, the overflow could be <br />put in, but it was not mandatary. Option 3 is the <br />installation of an 18 inch pipe, which would <br />necessitate no overflow. <br />7 <br />