Laserfiche WebLink
• <br /> � Clt� o� ORONO <br /> � RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL . <br /> � NO. 1394 <br /> • <br /> • - • • <br /> 6) On June 21, 1982, the applicants fi.led a variance <br /> application with the City requesting the following: <br /> a) Side Setback Variance for Principal Structure <br /> Lot 2 - side yard setback <br /> required 30 ' � <br /> proposed 20' • <br /> varianc� 10' or 33� <br /> b) Side Setback Variance for Attached Garage to <br /> Principal Structure � <br /> Lot 3 - side yard setback <br /> required 30' <br /> existing 50 ' <br /> proposed 10 ' ' <br /> variance 20' or 67� <br /> . 7) Prior to the filing of that application, the applicants' <br /> attorney, Larry Berg, was advi.sed by both the City <br /> Planner and the Zoning Administrator that Council h�s <br /> never approved a setback variance for proposed lots <br /> under subdivision review because lot lines can still be <br /> rearranged. . � <br /> � <br /> 8) During the variance review at the Planning Commission, <br /> Larry Berg presented the following findings: <br /> a) The existing driveway serving both lots 2 & 3. <br /> is situated so that it would serve an attached <br /> garage only on the west side of the ' existing <br /> house on Lot 3 . <br /> b) The interior design of existing house on Lot 3 � <br /> would not make attachment o n east side of house <br /> feasible. • <br /> c) The architect for the proposed new home on Lot 2 <br /> � finds the proposed location the only suitable � <br /> site for a house of the proposed size and retain <br /> a view of the lake. <br /> � <br /> Page 4 of 7 <br />