Laserfiche WebLink
.f , <br /> l <br /> � <br /> � � Cit� o� ORONO <br /> � RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL .. <br /> � NO. 1389 <br /> • � • • <br /> 2) Minnesota Laws 1980 Chapter 566 which amended State <br /> Section 462. 358 to require final plat approval within <br /> 1 year of preliminary approval does not become effective <br /> unless or until a City amends its platting code after <br /> the adoption of Chapter 566, which the City of Orono <br /> has not done. <br /> 3) The Council is concerned that approving a final plat <br /> for Schlee based solely upon the pr�liminary approval <br /> granted on July 13, 1981, will not allow. proper <br /> consideration of facts and information discovered as <br /> part of the subsequent review of application #671. <br /> 4) Density must be reviewed. The 24 unit plan for <br /> application #447 and #585 results ;_n a density of 2. 59 <br /> units/gross acre and 3.14 units/net acre. Net density <br /> exceeding 3. 00 units/acre requires a variance to Zoning <br /> • Code Section 34 . 621 yet the July 13, 1981, preliminary <br /> approval motion for #585 specifically provided that <br /> � no variances were being gran�ted. . <br /> � <br /> 5) Sewer availability must be reviewed. Completion of the , <br /> Community Management Plan in November, 1981, and the <br /> MWCC-mandated 5ewer Inflow and Infiltration report in <br /> early 1982 ideritified a previously unquantified peak- <br /> flow capacity problem in Lift Station #6 and associated <br /> trunk sewers. The preliminary engineering plans reviewed <br /> for application #447 must be revised and the sewer flow <br /> redirected as reviewed during application #671. <br /> 6) Traffic Flow and street layout must be reviewed. Traffic <br /> studies done for application #671 were much more detailed <br /> than the� review done for applications #447 and #585. <br /> The earlier reviews concentrated. on the 24 proposed units <br /> with provision for future access to adjacent property. <br /> Review for application #671 quantified the total proposed <br /> and future units served and estimated traffic flow <br /> generation. The result of the #671 review was a plan for <br /> multiple access points instead of the single direct access <br /> onto County Road 15 provided in the earlier #447 and #585 <br /> plans. Reverting to the #585 application will leave the <br /> potential for the same or greater traffic flows than <br /> � predicted in the #671 review. . The same problems exist. <br /> The same problems must be solved, presumably in the same <br /> manner as reviewed during the #671 review. <br /> y <br /> 2 of 4 <br />