Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Tuesday, January 16, 2018 <br /> 6:30 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />property and that it is his belief it is in the best interest of the neighborhood not to make this a two-story <br />house, especially given the street on three sides of the house. <br /> <br />Thiesse stated he is looking at the floor plan and he sees a sunroom and a study. Thiesse commented <br />those are wonderful to have but that the applicant might have to decrease the size. <br /> <br />Martineau noted the plan was originally at 38 feet wide and they reduced it to 36 feet wide. <br /> <br />Lemke asked whether a two-story would be preferable. <br /> <br />Thiesse indicated it would not be preferable but it would be allowed. <br /> <br />Leskinen stated having the road on three sides makes the lot more challenging and noted the new home <br />would be more centered on the lot. Leskinen questioned whether having a two-story house or having a <br />one-story that is 348 square feet over the allowed structural coverage is really the lesser of two evils. <br /> <br />Thiesse noted the home on one side is two stories and the other homes in the neighborhood are a story <br />and a half. <br /> <br />Landgraver stated the City thoroughly vetted the new structural coverage ratios and that he is not inclined <br />to approve the increase in structural coverage. Landgraver stated he is willing to approve a two-story <br />home since that is an efficient use of land. Landgraver stated if everything else were single story, he <br />might make an exception, but that he has a feeling that some of the other neighbors in the future may <br />want a two-story. <br /> <br />Oakden stated because the proposed house encroaches the setback, if those setbacks continue to be <br />proposed with a two-story home, they would require a variance since the second story would be a new <br />encroachment in height in the setback areas. <br /> <br />Landgraver moved, Schwingler seconded, to recommend denial of Application No. 18-4000,