My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-23-1988 - Agenda Packet City Council - regular meeting
Orono
>
City Council
>
1988
>
05-23-1988 - Agenda Packet City Council - regular meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/12/2026 10:57:02 AM
Creation date
9/2/2025 1:19:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Administration
Admin Doc Type
Agenda Packet City Council
Section
City Council
Subject
regular meeting
Document Date
5/23/1988
Retention Effective Date
9/2/2025
Retention
Permanent After File Date
Protection
Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
393
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
whcthci Cr not they are liable to be as- <br />sessed. l l <br />4. Ordering the improvement and preparation <br />of plans. The resolution ordering the <br />improvement may be passed by a mere <br />majority of the council if proceedings were <br />originally commenced by petition. If not, <br />the resolution must be adopted by an <br />affirmative vote by at least four -fifths of <br />the council. It is after this that the city <br />engineer should prepare the necessary plans <br />and specifications. At this point the <br />council should decide how the work is to <br />be d7Re and, if necessary, issue a call for <br />bids. <br />5. Tin:e limits for local imprure'ments. When <br />a city council determines to make a public <br />improvement, it must let the contract for <br />all or part of the work, or order all or part <br />of the work, done by day labor or other- <br />wise, no later than one year after the <br />adoption of the resolution ordering the <br />improvement, unless a different time is <br />specifically stated in the resolution order- <br />ing the improvement. <br />Performance of ►vork under contract or by <br />day labor. The work may be done by day <br />labor if the estimated cost does not exceed <br />15,000, if there are no bidders on the <br />project, or if the only bids received exceed <br />the estimated cost of the project. The term <br />"day labor" refers to a procedure whereby <br />the city carries out a public improvement <br />with its own employees or with persons <br />specifically hired for that purpose. No <br />contract is given wider this system; the city <br />itself assumes full responsibility for the <br />work. Even under this system, however, <br />purchases of more than $5,000 must be <br />obtaine from the lowest responsible <br />bidder' (See Chapter 21.) <br />7. Preparation of proposed assessment rolls. <br />These must contain the information listed <br />in the next subsection of this chapter. <br />Their preparation is the clerk's responsibili- <br />ty. 1 / It may be desirable to conduct <br />before and after market improvement <br />valuation studies regarding property to be <br />assessed to determine the amount of special <br />benefits. (See discussion of market value, <br />above). <br />V. <br />1'tiblic hearing off the pro!( osc•d assessment. <br />The purpose of this second hearing is to <br />give affected property owners an op- <br />portunity to be heard on the (natter of the <br />actual assessments being levied. Notice <br />must be published one or more times in <br />the official newspaper and mailed to each <br />property owner at least two weeks prior to <br />the hearing date. Finally, the total cost of <br />the improvement project must be published <br />in the city newspaper or, if none, in a <br />county seat newspaper.) 8 <br />It may be advisable in light of recent court <br />decisions, to make available to the property <br />owner an adversary proceeding at this <br />hearing where evidence of market value <br />Improvement will be considered and made <br />a part of the assessment determination. <br />The hearing notice shouid cont?in a state- <br />ment that those who wish to dispute their <br />assessment as determined in usual formula <br />fashion may notify the council, and the <br />council can then arrange for a hearing <br />before an impartial hearing officer. The <br />property owner could then put in such <br />testimony as he thinks is relevant con- <br />cerning the improvement in market value <br />of this property, and the city could do <br />likewise. A detailed record of this evident <br />should be made. The city could than adoi <br />the assessment roll, including assessmer s <br />determined on a conventional formula ba• i <br />and also including those determin• d <br />in adversary proceedings. <br />Appro-val and certification of assessment <br />rolls. :after the public hearing, the council <br />must approve the assessment rolls in <br />their'nal form so that the clerk can certify <br />th , to the county auditor for collec- <br />tion. <br />The (council should examine their assess - <br />rolls in a very practical way to <br />. mine whether or not an appeal is <br />like)-; -to result from a particular assessment <br />and v4-wther that assessment is realistic in <br />views vif the real estate market in their city. <br />10. Issurna-c of obligatiins to finance the <br />impso�c??.cnt. (This topic is discussed <br />furtlNer '.:i the subsection entitled "Borrow- <br />ing -fo< Special Assessment Purposes.") <br />For a ftit l,0iset--ion of these steps, plus a full set <br />of model fore c, s~, League publication "Local <br />Improvement <br />- 408 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.