Laserfiche WebLink
. 44 <br />51788.2 <br />i 1. <br />t W11 MEETING <br />TO: Mayor and City Council f';�Y 3 <br />FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administratoo C Y OF okoko <br />DATE: May 17, 1988 <br />SUBJECT: Continuation of Public Hearing - Highwood Storm Sewer <br />Attachment A. Highwood Storm Sewer Project Memo Dated 4/15/88 <br />B. Glenn Cook Letter Dated 5/19/88 <br />C. City of Orono Minutes Dated 4/25/88 <br />D. McCurdy Letter Dated "/19/88 <br />ISSUES - <br />1. Continuation of the public hearing. <br />2. Determination as to Counci l's desiring to undertake any <br />public improvements in response to this problem. <br />INTRODUCTION - At the April 25, 1988 Council meeting, Council <br />took initial testimony at a public hearing and directed the <br />public hearing be continued to the May 23, 1988 meeting. At that <br />meeting concerns addressed regarded both water quality and storm <br />water quantity in this area. In addition the principal property <br />owners, the Vongries, who are involved in this were not able to <br />be present at that meeting. <br />For background information as noted in Attachment C the City did <br />consider this matter in 1975 and directed to Mr. Sauer that the <br />only remedy to this problem was a public improvement. <br />DISCUSSION_ - Since the last Council meeting, as noted in <br />Attachment B, the Engineer has explored alternative solutions to <br />this problem which include the following: <br />A. Detention of storm water on tn? north side of County <br />Road 19 for a period of time. This was determined by <br />the Engineer not to be cost effective. <br />B. Creation of a larger detention basin on the backside <br />of Sauer's property by lowering the existing grade in <br />that area a couple feet and using some of the material <br />to berm the houses of Sauer's and Baxter together with <br />having Mr. Sauer move his shed out of the area. This <br />may not be cost effective. <br />C. Instead of re -piping the whole area look to re -pipe <br />only the portion of the existing tile which crosses the <br />McCurdy and Vongries property. Together with providing <br />the manholp and overflow with an 8" pipe. Mr. McCurdy <br />has indicated in Attachment D that this is not <br />acceptable to him. <br />