My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packet Cc - regular meeting 5/23/1988
Orono
>
City Council
>
1988
>
Agenda Packet Cc - regular meeting 5/23/1988
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/6/2025 10:14:47 AM
Creation date
9/2/2025 1:19:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Administration
Admin Doc Type
Agenda Packet CC
Section
City Council
Subject
regular meeting
Document Date
5/23/1988
Retention Effective Date
9/2/2025
Retention
Permanent After File Date
Protection
Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
393
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Should the City choose to go out and bid this project out rather <br />than go with a contract addendum, it may have an impact as to <br />whether it will later be able utilize the proposed contract price <br />as an addendum. If the City chooses to bid it should have it bid <br />by the date for the public hearing, although enough time exists <br />to have that done. <br />The City of Spring Park's estimate on the feasibility was $25,000 <br />over what they had previously been given. Apparently for similar <br />reason. (It should additionally be noted that NSP has been <br />contacted and would be willing to bury most of the electrical <br />lines along County 15 for the "reasonable" price of ($200,000)). <br />ALTERNATIVES - <br />Issue 1. Determination to go ahead <br />A. Agree to go ahead at the higher price <br />B. Choose to do nothing further <br />C. Table <br />Issue 2. Set a public hearing date if goinq ahead <br />A. Set a date for May 23, 1988 <br />B. Table <br />Issue 3. Preliminary financing <br />A. Choo::e to assess 5113,000 plus a portion of the 10% <br />(This would raise the estimates in Attachment B <br />by about 20%) <br />B. Assess the $97,000 and have the City pay fc he <br />overage either through MSA or general tax f .s <br />C. City pay for the entire amount of street lighting <br />D. Not go ahead <br />Iss.ie 4. Determination as to biri <br />A. Make this as an addendum to the present contract <br />B. Bid to see if we can get a better price than the <br />current contract in existance <br />C. Table <br />RECOMMENDATION_ - It is recommended that. despite the increase in <br />cost the City go ahead setting a public hearing date for May 23, <br />1988 to assess $97,000 of th, eta 1 cost with the balance to come <br />out of MSA/General funds. _ '� <br />1-111 <br />PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by seconded b , that. the City rt <br />May 23, 1988 as the public earing date for assessin5 S97,909 in <br />street lighti costs �"I S <br />th the balance to come out of MA eneral <br />f a ids. Ayes Nays �_. <br />cc: Ehlers and Associates <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.