Laserfiche WebLink
Kent Swanson <br /> , Page 2 <br /> � ��: C�t�_ o� ORONO_ __- <br /> • - .:��r:t <br /> `�". RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> ����:=' NO. 13 5 7 .. <br /> � y� <br /> :_,� <br /> • � • • ',. <br /> + 6) 3, 500 sf of the 7, 167 . 5 sf of existing hardcover <br /> . on the property is the shared driveway for abutting <br /> properties . <br /> 7) The neighbors on the abutting properties have written <br /> to the City affirming their approval of the proposed <br /> improvements by the applicant finding there would be <br /> no detrimental effects to their property. <br /> 8) Council approved the following improvements on the <br /> property: <br /> � a) A 472 sf lakeside addition requiring a structural <br /> setback encroachment into lakeshore setback area <br /> of 2 . 5 ' finding the integrity� of the interior . <br /> design would be maintained and a decrease in the <br /> impact on the 0-75 ' protected area by removing <br /> 23 :sf_of hardcover with the removal of the brick <br /> patio. <br /> • b) The roofing and screen siding of the ex�sting 9 . 8 ' <br /> x 16 . 1' deck finding no further structural <br /> encroachment into the lakeshore setback area and, . ,. ,, <br /> no additional hardcover because of the existing <br /> patio area under the subject deck. <br /> c) A 3 ' x 20 ' second story walkway along the lakeside <br /> of the house finding the lakeshore setback <br /> • encroachment to be only . 5 ' because of the existing <br /> 2.5 ' overhang and no increase in the hardcover <br /> because of the existing 3 ' walkway under the <br /> proposed walkway. <br /> d) A 400 sf patio area within the 75 ' - 250 ' setback <br /> area finding this would replace the patio area <br /> within the 0-75 ' setback area in addition to the <br /> � applicant being advised to employ environmenta�l <br /> selection in the design of the patio. <br /> 9) The special conditions applying to the structure or <br /> land in question are peculiar to such property or <br /> immediately surrounding property and do not apply <br /> generally to other land or structures in the district <br /> in which said land is located. , <br /> 10) The granting of the application is necessary for the <br /> preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property <br /> � right of the applicant. <br /> 11) The granting of the proposed variance will not in <br /> . any way impair the public health, safety, comfort, <br /> morals or general welfare. <br />