Laserfiche WebLink
• • #13-3595 <br /> 15 February 2013 <br /> Page 5 of 6 <br /> Utility Locations and Availability <br /> The subject property is located within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA); sewer service is <br /> available to these properties via the Hackberry system which discharges to the Long Lake system. Water <br /> service is available from the Long Lake system subject to Long Lake approval. Sewer and Water Fees will <br /> be due to Long Lake, subject to the provisions of the Glendale Cove Sewer and Water Agreement of <br /> January 2012, which defines the applicant's properties as Category 3 Properties (see Exhibit H). <br /> The developer will be responsible for installation of sewer and water laterals to serve the development. <br /> Per past City practice there will not be a connection charge to Orono for sewer or water, but Long Lake <br /> connection charges will apply. <br /> It is important to confirm whether there is an easement for the existing sewer in proposed Lots 1 and 2. <br /> If not, such an easement will become a plat requirement. <br /> Issues for Discussion <br /> Access & Layout Options: There are a number of potential options to accomplish a more functional cul- <br /> de-sac layout and road connection to the east. Staff has developed a series of sketches depicting options <br /> for consideration. <br /> Sketch 1 puts a slight curve in the entry from Willow, and then includes a future 50' angled corridor <br /> from the cul-de-sac to the NW corner of the property to the SE. This layout also reduces the length of <br /> the outlot driveway to Lot 3 to around 100 feet. <br /> A second option is shown in Sketch 2. This option avoids platting a permanent cul-de-sac and makes use <br /> of temporary cul-de-sac easements. This type of layout has been used on occasion in the past; the <br /> benefit is that if/when the road is extended to serve the next property, the temporary cul-de-sac can be <br /> physically removed and the underlying land can revert back to the appropriate owners via extinguishing <br /> the easement rather than vacating a platted road. This option also saves on future survey costs. <br /> Either of the options shown in Staff Sketches 1 and 2 have some impact on lot shapes and potential <br /> house locations. Also, both fix the future through road connection at the very NW corner of the adjacent <br /> property, which potentially would make for a less than optimum future connection point. Staff Sketch 3 <br /> suggests a rearrangement of lot lines so that 5 lots access via the cul-de-sac and 1 accesses directly from <br /> Willow Drive or from a future road that could be located along the north or south boundary of what is <br /> shown as lot 5. This has positive and negative aspects. It would potentially provide a better future road <br /> location for developing the property to the east. But the second road corridor takes up more real estate <br /> and, if located between lot 5 and lots 4/6, lots 4/6 become 'through' lots, a negative aspect. <br /> Wetland Delineation & Conservation Design: The applicant should conduct a wetland delineation as well <br /> as prepare a conservation design analysis so the site can be more comprehensively analyzed with the <br /> preliminary plat application. The wetlands or other natural features may affect lot layout. <br /> Miscellaneous: <br /> 1. In any of the proposals, the road corridors are directly across from existing homes which front <br /> on Willow, and the headlights from cars leaving the site could become an annoyance. <br />