My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Project Packet
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
W
>
Watertown Road
>
2145 Watertown Road - 03-117-23-21-0003
>
Land Use
>
00-2575, VAR
>
Project Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/28/2025 1:54:19 PM
Creation date
8/28/2025 1:54:11 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
l."ik, 0.4,\ <br /> i0 0\ <br /> .^44 <br /> „: to- CITY of ORONO <br /> lei I 0 O G RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> I ESH4�' NO. . <br /> WHEREAS, after due published notice and mailed notice in accordance with <br /> Minnesota Statutes and the City of Orono Zoning and Planning Codes, the Orono Planning <br /> Commission held a public hearing on April 17, 2000 at which times all persons desiring to be <br /> heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and <br /> WHEREAS, the applicants have applied to the City for variances to Municipal <br /> Zoning Code Section 10.28, Subdivision 5 (B) to permit construction of a 816 s.f. second story <br /> addition to the residence 26.5' from the rear yard property line where 50' is required. <br /> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, <br /> Minnesota: <br /> FINDINGS <br /> 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #2575. <br /> 2. The property is located in the RR-1B, Rural Residential Zoning District requiring <br /> 2 acres in area. The property consists of total area of 87,054 s.f. or 1.99 acres. <br /> 3. The Planning Commission reviewed this application on April 17, 2000 and <br /> recommended approval on a vote of 5 to 0. <br /> 4. The Planning Commission made the following findings of fact: <br /> A. The footprint of the residence is not increasing. <br /> B. The residence was constructed prior to current zoning standards. <br /> C. No neighboring residence will be impacted by the 26.5' setback. <br /> 5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar <br /> to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that <br /> granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor <br /> pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely <br /> Page 2 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.