Laserfiche WebLink
lJ <br />MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 16, 1988 <br />ORDINANCE AMENDMENT - <br />CLARIFICATION ON USE OF CLEAN FILL <br />PUBLIC HEARING 9:07-9:07 <br />The Affidavit of Publication was noted. <br />CC, - <br />3; <br />PRL <br />CONT . <br />There were no comments from the public regarding this <br />matter and the public hearing was closed. <br />It was moved by Kelley, .seconded by Bellows, to <br />recommend approval of the proposed ordinance amendment <br />clarifying the use of clean fill. Motion, Ayes e, Nays <br />0. <br />,+E OF RUTH SMITH/CEDRICR DETTLOFF <br />1RCHARD ROAD SOUTH <br />. SUBDIVISION <br />OCR OF PUBLIC HEARING 7:31-8:02 <br />Attorneys Betsy Baker and Edward Callahan representing <br />the Estate of Ruth Smith and Attorney Larry Berg <br />representing Cedric Dettloff were present for this <br />matter. <br />Mabusth explained that this matter was tabled at the <br />November Planning Commission meeting pending res-:j.ve of <br />the location of the existing septic system within Lot 1, <br />need for the realignment of the shr-:Ad lot line <br />providing a future access corridor i.,r Lot 2 if <br />developed at some pu i.il in the future.- and dcturir.ination <br />as to the type of wetlands within 2 not currently <br />shown oia the preliminary plat. T, ,jacent property <br />owners, the MacMi;. ; -n+s have execs _mod a preliminary <br />purchase agr_eer., ►..t pending resolve ut this subdivision <br />application. The septic location and tyke of soils <br />within the designatea wetland issues cannot be resolved <br />until sp-ing, therefore, staff recommends resolve of <br />these i-:.,a%s prior to final plat approval. <br />Cohen ob;ected to recommending preliminary su`!-;?iv-' •ion <br />approval prior to resolving these issues. <br />A*..orney r:..11ahan felt that the issues to be resolved <br />were of nu consequer^e to grantiom preliminary a,.,rlroval <br />of =he two -lot subdivision. <br />Cohen voiced concern with dealing 4,itii the septic system <br />issue if it is found to be encrciaching the lr t line. <br />._`torney Callahan felt that if the septic system was <br />encroaching the Lot line ++ould just be a ma • t ti of <br />--owing the septic system l -',e lot line and therefore <br />should not delay preliminai. _subdivision approval. <br />3 <br />