My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packet Cc - regular meeting 5/9/1988
Orono
>
City Council
>
1988
>
Agenda Packet Cc - regular meeting 5/9/1988
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/6/2025 10:14:47 AM
Creation date
8/26/2025 12:35:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Administration
Admin Doc Type
Agenda Packet CC
Section
City Council
Subject
regular meeting
Document Date
5/9/1988
Retention Effective Date
8/26/2025
Retention
Permanent After File Date
Protection
Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
616
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
M"•':�?`BS OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL AEETING HELD APRIL 25, 1988 <br />HIGHNOe' DAD STORM SPURR CONTINUED <br />Public Works Director Gerhardson stated those costs were <br />for the City owned property in the Hi_ghwood area. <br />There were no more comments from the public on this <br />matter and the public hearing was closed. <br />Counci lmernber Goetten asked if the petition contained <br />35% of th•e affected property owners. <br />Public Works Director Gerhardson responded that the <br />petition did meet the 35% petition requirement. <br />Councilmember Peterson noted that .i of the 7 petitioners <br />were not listed in the proposed assessment cost sheets. <br />It was need that after the feasibility study was done, <br />it was determined that these three properties did not <br />directly affect the drainage area. <br />City Attorney Barrett explained that the 35% petition <br />requirement only affects the final vote percentage to <br />order the actual study to be undertaken. <br />Councilmember Sime did .got feel that the actual prcblem <br />of ponding had been addressed in this study. <br />Mayor Grabek felt that the impact on water quality <br />needed to addressed further. <br />It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember <br />Sime, to table this matter until the May 25th Council <br />meeting for further information and consideration. <br />Councilmember Goetten asked if the motion included any <br />further feasibility studies? <br />Mayor Grabek responded no, however more costs may be <br />incurred to determine the water quality information. <br />Councilmember Sime asked if a ponding area could be <br />provided on the City property to help alleviate some of <br />the -.- -iinage? <br />City Engineer Cook was doubtful that this would be <br />feasible. He noted the area that would be the most <br />effective ponding area. <br />Public Works Director Gerhardson also noted that many <br />trees would need to be removed and major land alteration <br />would need to be done to provide a pcnding area on the <br />City owned property. <br />Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.