My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-09-1988 - Agenda Packet City Council - regular meeting
Orono
>
City Council
>
1988
>
05-09-1988 - Agenda Packet City Council - regular meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/12/2026 10:57:02 AM
Creation date
8/26/2025 12:35:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Administration
Admin Doc Type
Agenda Packet City Council
Section
City Council
Subject
regular meeting
Document Date
5/9/1988
Retention Effective Date
8/26/2025
Retention
Permanent After File Date
Protection
Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
616
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Irl <br />MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MARCH 21, 1988 <br />i1254 TRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCH <br />2060 SIXTH AVENUE NORTH <br />CONDITIONAL USE. PERMIT/VARIANCES <br />PUBLIC HEARING 9:07-9:31 <br />The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing <br />were noted. <br />Present for this matter were: John Lundquist, immediate <br />past President of the Congregation, and Craig Moleski of <br />Trinity Lutheran Church, and Dick Brownlee, architect <br />for this project. <br />Jacobs explained the proposed commercial site plan and <br />request for conditional use permit for the existing non- <br />conforming use and setback variance for the proposed <br />parking lot expansion. <br />Regarding the requirement of installing sprinkler system <br />in the church, Jacobs stated that a variance cannot be <br />granted to this requirement because it is a State <br />Building Code requirment which the City has adopted. <br />Mr. Lundquist stated that it was his understanding that <br />a variance could be granted to the SBC requirement. He <br />felt it would be unrealistic and unfair to impose this <br />requirement because of the lack of public water to this <br />sit•. He noted that the new design will have an <br />enhanced pedestrian travel flow within the building so <br />that the ability to get in and out in case of an <br />emergency will be better than currently exists. <br />Chairman Kelley stated that the Planning Commission <br />could not decide on this issue, it would have to be <br />addressed by the City's legal staff and Council. <br />Bellows noted that no future day ca-� use would be <br />allowed without installing a sprinkler system. <br />Bellows noted the issue of th existing septic system <br />that has not been documented but is expected to be found <br />as substandard in size and design for the proposed <br />addition. She c:id not feel this plF could be approved <br />without these facts. <br />Mr. Lundquist noted the use of the church would not <br />necessarily increase with this addition. <br />Gaffron stated the septic system was a concern and staff <br />will require soil testing and system design be submitted <br />and approved by the City prior to issuance of any permit. <br />for the building additions. <br />13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.