04-25-1988 - Agenda Packet City Council - regular meeting

Home Browse Search

Zoning File #1233 Page 2 of 4 Exhibit F - Plat Map Exhibit G - Cook Letter 12/15/87 Exhibit H - Cook Letter 2/24/88 Exhibit I - Cook Letter 3/17/88 Exhibit J - Cook Letter 4/20/88 Exhibit K - Halley Letter 3/7/88 Exhibit L - First Grading Plan/Survey - December Planning Commission Meeting Exhibit M - Second Grading Plan/Survey - March Planning Commission Meeting Exhibit N - Third Grading Plan/Survey - Final Plan Exhibit 0 - Planning Commission Minutes 12/21/87 Exhibit P - Planning Commission Minutes 3/21/88 Exhibit Q - Applicant's Engineers Letter of 4/13/88 Exhibit R - Profile of Boulder Wall - Photos of Existing Block Wall Exhibit S - Floor Plans Exhibit T - Elevations at East/West Property Line Exhibit U - East, West, South Elevations Exhibit V - Cross Section Review of Application December Planning Commission Meeting At the December Planning Commission Meeting, the application covered the excavation of the lakeshore yard to allow for a walkout design. As a result of the excavation of the lakesnore yard, the upper tear of the existing block retaining wall would be removed. The applicant proposed redoing the lower tear adjacent to the lakeshore. The application was denied, finding no adaquate hardship to allow the excavation of the lakeshore protected area. Applicant was advised to move the house back further. Note, this application involves the construction of a new residence, there is no attempt to use the foundation of existing residence. Applicant was advised that there was adaquate room to the rear of the property to create the walkout design. The application was unanimously denied by the Planning Commission. March Meeting c,f the Planning Commission Applicant prrsented 7 revised plan to the Planning Commission that now sought to rerlace the existing retaining walls within the lakeshore yard and approval of a Conditional Use Peri-it and Variance for an underground drainage ti:.e that would serve to drain the bowl area now created by the higher elevations lakeside of the patio walkout area. Review Exhibit M and V. Note that a berm prevents drainage to flow down the lakeshore. It necessary to provide a release for the drainage retention trapped in l area in order to prevent flooding of the lower level of the residence. light of recent actions and recommendations of both Planning Commission ,r,-] Council, the underground drainage pipe was denied. The portion of the application that would have allowed the replacement of the lakeshore retaining walls damaged in the July storm was approved by the Planning Comimission.