Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF i'Hl REGULAR CiRONO CITY COUNCIL <br /> n�y'� c r T'.s.`..' 4T)T' » IAAC <br /> MEETING HELD O SEL 21R11,T1111L 1995 <br /> (#7 -#2048 James &Joann Jundt- Continued) <br /> It was noted that this is the sixth application by th applicants. <br /> Callahan moved, Kelley seconded, to approve Resolution #3599. Ayes 3,Nays 0. <br /> (#8) #2050 WILLIAM TOLES, 3165 NORTH SHORE DRIVE - VARIANCE - <br /> RESOLUTION #3600 <br /> The applicant was not present but was represented by the realtor for the property. <br /> Gaffron reported that the application is for hardcover and average lakeshore setback <br /> variances. The property was subject to a variance application in 1988. The current <br /> • hardcover calculations match that which were approved in 1988. The proposed,pool <br /> would be 115' from the shoreline. The average lakeshore setback is defined by the house <br /> to the northeast, and the house on the west, which is set back. Gaffron said there would <br /> be no impact on these neighboring homes. <br /> The hardcover calculations shows 33.1% existing in the 75-250' zone, where 25% is <br /> allowed, and is proposed at 32.6%. The reduction in hardcover will be acquired through <br /> the removal of 1390 s.f of landscape fabric and plastic and 400 s.f of concrete and wood <br /> patio. <br /> The pool was looked at as structure. The Planning Commission recommended approval <br /> of the application with reductions as noted in hardcover. The applicant was asked to <br /> reduce more hardcover if this was possible. <br /> Hun said she saw no problem with the average lakeshore setback but saw no hardship to <br /> add to the structural hardcover. Hun asked if there was anywhere to reduce the amount <br /> of hardcover. Gaffron said any further removal would affect the house or driveway. <br /> It was noted that this application was for a hardcover variance only, not a structural <br /> coverage variance. The structural coverage is at 11% with the proposed pool. Gaffron <br /> said the review of hardcover and structure was made due to the issue of non-structural <br /> versus structural hardcover issue with landscape beds and plastic underlayment. <br /> Hurr asked for clarification of the reduction of non-structural and decking by 400'. <br /> Gaffron said the reduction is from a patio 2' above grade. The 400 s.f in patio would be <br /> in exchange for the 1500 s.f pool. There is a net reduction in non-structural hardcover <br /> of 137 s.f_ with the removal of 1390 s.f of plastic and fabric. <br /> 5 <br />