My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Project Packet
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
N
>
North Shore Drive
>
2180 North Shore Drive - 10-117-23-31-0098
>
Land Use
>
10-3442, CUP
>
Project Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/21/2025 1:33:43 PM
Creation date
8/21/2025 1:33:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
x Address Old
House Number
2180
Street Name
North Shore
Street Type
Drive
Address
2180 North Shore Dr
Document Type
Land Use
Permit Number
3442
PIN
1011723310098
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
329
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
March 9, 2010 <br /> Honorable Mayor White and Councilmembers, <br /> I want to be mindful and considerate of your time; I'm sure yo are contacted frequently. I have a few thoughts, <br /> however, that I feel compelled to share with you. I hope you wil have a few minutes to read this through; I hope, <br /> too, that you will find this information useful. <br /> First, I want to say that I have been taught to respect my gov rnment representatives and to use such address <br /> language as the opening above. I confess, however, that I hav rarely felt representatives to be worthy of such <br /> honor. You, each of you, have encouraged me a great deal in t e way you allowed, listened, learned, and <br /> discussed. I tip my hat to each of you...and...thank you again f r your service to Orono and to your sometimes <br /> unruly constituents. <br /> Mayor Jim, I especially want to commend you for respectfully allowing every person to speak who desired to do <br /> so at last night's Council meeting. I observed all of you listenin intently to comments made and gleaning from <br /> them information pertinent to the Hill School CUP. I then enjoy d your free, fair and impartial bantering of ideas. <br /> It appears to me that you have great respect for your neighbors ..your constituents...and for one another. It was <br /> enjoyable to observe...Thank you. <br /> I am naturally an analytical person. I listen, observe, and reap to gather information so that I can attempt to <br /> bring order to the chaos that so often surrounds us. I have don0 so regarding the Hill School CUP and beg your <br /> indulgence as I share my perceptions. <br /> This discussion must begin with an expression of some consternation with one of my neighbor's approaches to <br /> this issue. His input has been filled with questions which I believe he should have had answered by the good <br /> folks at Emily instead of broadcasting them as if there might be truth there imbedded. His tirades included <br /> conjecture and innuendo. All of that quite obviously put the folk at Emily on the defensive...hardly a neighborly <br /> approach, in my opinion. These tirades have also resulted in o r community becoming split and in our city <br /> becoming less favorably considered by the rest of the metro ar a. I have thought much about how that might <br /> have been avoided. More on that later. <br /> My final (at least to this point) belief is that this was never abcut...nor should it have ever been about...the <br /> worthy Emily Program. As the realtors say: Location, Location, Location; I would say this should be about Land <br /> Use, Land Use, Land Use...As I believe each of you concluded land stated in some form last night. Here's my <br /> take on this matter: Someone alertly used the expression, "Intertsification of Land Use". I believe that expression <br /> could well be summarized by the word, "residential," in this cas . Further, I would suggest that the expression <br /> could be symbolized by the paradigm, 24/7/365. <br /> What I mean to say here...this is my opinion...is that Orono hould not EVER allow continual use by a non- <br /> profit, or especially, by a for-profit organization in a residentially zoned part of the city. None of the existing <br /> entities in the Crystal Bay area have or have ever had round-th -clock hours. Not the Post Office, not the Art <br /> Center, not the Dakota Trail, not the school or any other occup nt previously in the Hill School building...Have I <br /> missed any? <br /> To my and to my wife's way of thinking, this issue should never have been about the Emily Program. <br /> Regardless the applicant, this CUP, which would grant permission to an organization to offer continuous service <br /> to its clientele in a residential area, should not even have been considered. I have thought this over quite a bit <br /> and have asked myself, "How could all of this clamor and distru t and anger have been avoided?" <br /> I believe the Orono staff should not have accepted a CUP ap lication for a 24/7/365 operation in a residential <br /> area...Issue over. Perhaps the staff does not presently have th t authority. Then, the Planning Commission had <br /> no business (in my reasoned opinion) forwarding this CUP to t e Council. If they had denied the CUP on the <br /> basis of intensification of land use...Issue over. Lawsuits? May e...but as Jim put it, "We have an attorney, too." <br /> My last point and my last thank you for getting through this m ssage: Orono should structure the CUP <br /> application procedures in such a way that they guarantee (as n ar as possible) that an application like this is not <br /> brought forward to Council in the future, yielding hard feelings a d hard expressions of frustration. <br /> Greg Peterson <br /> 1355 Arbor St(through lot to Briar, mere feet from the Hill Schoc1)l property) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.