Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> bgnilorr F <br /> PoJAT'J jA14 <br /> 11, Zofo <br /> 10. #10-3442,DIRK MILLER ON BEHALF OF THE EMILY PROGRAM,2180 NORTH <br /> SHORE DRIVE,VARIANCES & CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT,7:47 P.M.-8:12 P.M. <br /> Dirk Miller,Applicant,was present. j <br /> Curtis stated the applicant is requesting a conditional use pe it and setback variances in order to <br /> operate an in-patient eating disorder treatment facility for us to eight clients in the existing building on <br /> the property. The Emily Program intends to maintain as mu h of a residential character of the property <br /> as possible by limiting signage and changes to the exterior nishes of the building which are not <br /> consistent with a single family home. Due to the location o I the existing building on the property, <br /> setback variances are also requested. A"hospital use"requii es a 100-foot setback from adjacent <br /> residentially zoned properties where the school use only req ired a 50-foot setback. <br /> Based on the hospital use requirement outlined within City I ode 78-418(14),the proposed use requires <br /> a minimum of 600 square feet of lot area for each person to s e accommodated. The applicant is <br /> proposing an 8-bed facility. The property has 25,440 squat-, feet in area and exceeds this requirement. <br /> (#10-3442,DIRK MILLER ON BEHALF OF THE EMI Y PROGRAM,CONTINUED) <br /> The requirement for open parking spaces in a location other han a required yard cannot be met on this <br /> property. A previously approved variance for the previous ser allowed parking to be located within the <br /> required 50-foot side street yard and a 10-foot setback is me from the interior side lot line and rear lot <br /> line. As the new use has a greater yard requirement,a new ariance will need to be granted for the <br /> parking within the required 100 foot yard area. <br /> The proposed location of the conditional use is in accord wi h the objectives of the City's conditional use <br /> permit and the purposes of the district in which the site is to ated and the comprehensive municipal plan. <br /> Staff also finds that the proposed location of the conditional se and the proposed condition under which <br /> it would be operated or maintained would not be detrimenta to the public health, safety or welfare, or <br /> materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vic'nity. The proposed conditional use will <br /> comply with each of the applicable provisions of Zoning Or inance Section 78-916. <br /> Staff finds that the proposed use is compatible with the requ rements of 78-418(14)and the applicant <br /> is able to meet the conditions outlined within the code. As t e applicant is proposing to utilize an <br /> existing building, a building with some local historic value, taff finds the setback variance request is <br /> reasonable. <br /> Further,the proposed use will result in fewer vehicle trips to and from the site than the previous <br /> occupant and in particular will eliminate the high-traffic tim s of the former occupant. Residents will <br /> typically come and go as a group on an outing or other activ ty in a single vehicle. Clinicians and <br /> employees are small in number and visit at staggered times s the facility runs on a 24-hour schedule. <br /> Planning Staff recommends approval of the conditional use permit with variances for the Emily Program <br /> as proposed. <br /> Schoenzeit asked whether any future changes in the use of this property would require the application to <br /> come back before the Planning Commission. <br />