Laserfiche WebLink
Printup stated he has heard more valid public safety reason lI not to support it and that he would like to keep <br /> Orono rural in character. Printup requested the City Councjil delay any approval vote tonight or in the very <br /> near future because a lot more thought and consideration needs to go into this application. Printup requested <br /> the City Council not take the approach of"I know what's best for you,"because we live here,we know best, <br /> and those are the two reasons why you should oppose this program from operating in Orono. <br /> Steve Byrnes, 1025 Heritage Lane,noted that he does have connection to the Emily Program. Byrnes stated <br /> he has never met Dr. Miller,but he would like to say thank ou to him for saving his sister's life,who suffered <br /> from an eating disorder. <br /> Byrnes commented that it is time some of the residents spe: in favor and support of The Emily Program. <br /> Byrnes indicated he has been a resident of Orono his entire''.dult life a that he s surprised at the reaction of <br /> some of his neighbors. The residents here live in a wond 1 city,with a number of resources.. This is an <br /> opportunity to help others. Byrnes stated simply because y®4','Psuffer from an eating differ does not mean <br /> that you are mentally ill. The people who seek help for an-iting disorder is because they want help and not <br /> because they are court ordered. <br /> Byrnes noted he does have some concerns as well. He has o small boys who like to play in the park,walk to <br /> the post office, and run on the trail. Byrnes stated the provi•ions he has and from Dr. Miller and the fact that <br /> they are willing to surrender the CUP is goodnougipr h'ag and that this is a wonderful opportunity to help <br /> our neighbors and other people out. <br /> Mike Maddie,2150 Prospect Avenue, statedstatedVowing the rst city Council meeting,he wanted to learn some <br /> more facts about The EmilyProgram. He didmake a visit io one the facilities because he had some <br /> �I ne ofhe major concerns is what due diligence <br /> concerns due to his lack of knowledgell�out the prc� raj g <br /> has been done by the City and Staff as it relates to this ag tion and the fact that all of the information on <br /> the program has come from the applicant. <br /> (4. #10-3442 THE EMILY ()GRAM,2180 NORT', SHORE DRIVE, Continued) <br /> Maddie indicated he did go to the Na nal tang Disorders website in an attempt to learn more about this <br /> disorder � <br /> �; t �` Auld like to diddle grou d on this application and try to figure out what <br /> furthe, '�o�atiori""�s n " In order to del ' ne,:what is pest for The Emily Program,the community, and <br /> the rodents of this neighbothot. <br /> die noted the majority of the residents oppose the proposed location. Some of the rationale for <br /> opposinginclude, one, operating a %7 facility will change the character and identity of the Crystal Bay <br /> neighbo ,two, constant em cy calls at the facility will have an impact on the children's perspective <br /> of safety in the neighborhood;and' ee, in terms of safety and risk concerns,the facility will be a non-locked <br /> down facility. Made asked Wit&feasible to presume that'Isomeone with suicidal thoughts who flees the <br /> facility will pose,a clear a resent risk. <br /> Murphy noted an adderFurn to that statement would be, a cl ar and present risk to whom. <br /> Maddie indicated he presumes the person would be a risk to imself. As it relates to traffic and parking, <br /> based on the research that he has done,all logical indication point to the fact that it is likely traffic will <br /> increase on the weekends,which is when most people will b home. Maddie noted he did speak to some real <br /> estate agents who seem to think that property valuations cou d potentially be negatively impacted but they are <br /> unable to quantify that. <br /> Maddie stated as it relates to due diligence on complaints ag inst the facility,the residents were told by Dr. <br /> Miller that he was aware of no complaints against the buildi g. The neighbors feel that additional objective <br />