My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Project Packet
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
N
>
North Shore Drive
>
2180 North Shore Drive - 10-117-23-31-0098
>
Land Use
>
10-3442, CUP
>
Project Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/21/2025 1:33:43 PM
Creation date
8/21/2025 1:33:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
x Address Old
House Number
2180
Street Name
North Shore
Street Type
Drive
Address
2180 North Shore Dr
Document Type
Land Use
Permit Number
3442
PIN
1011723310098
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
329
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
COUNCIL EXHIBIT B <br /> Melanie Curtis Public Comments / Information <br /> #15 <br /> From: Pmsbooknut[pmsbooknut@aol.com] <br /> Sent: Friday, March 05, 2010 12:38 AM <br /> To: Melanie Curtis <br /> Subject: Emily Program/positive letter to council <br /> Dear Mayor White and Orono City council members, <br /> I am writing this to encourage you to approve the Emily Program's pplication for a CUP for the former Hill School site. If <br /> you think that an IUP would be more appropriate then I would urge ou to go that route even if that means there would be <br /> an extra few steps necessary. Please do not deny the Emily Progra the chance to become part of the Orono community. <br /> The"reasons" stated publicly for opposing this approval are dising nuous, illogical, and completely unbelievable. The <br /> opposition has cited the usual "horrors" of traffic, noise, lights, fire hazards and falling property values in their almost <br /> hysterical reaction to this request. These are totally illogical since the former Hill School had more traffic, more people in <br /> and out, noisy students and I'm sure the same fire hazards(althougtr I guess there weren't any students doing laundry <br /> there). The most obvious contradiction, however, is the existence of!the Minnetonka Art Center just next to the school <br /> property. Clearly, the Art Center is a much larger and more visible building with a very large parking lot. The Center has a <br /> very large number of people coming and going during the week, over the weekend, in the summer and basically all the <br /> time. I am sure they have large deliveries of many supplies. I know t ey have numerous events that even include, gasp, <br /> food! I believe the parking lot has lights-the building certainly does. I would venture to say that there are many more <br /> people in this building at any one time than will be at the Emily Prog am's location. Do these objectors have nothing <br /> against the possible fire hazard posed by oil paints, paint thinner, p per, firing kilns and all the other equipment used at <br /> the Center?There may even be some biohazards there!Why don't hese objectors think that a school in their <br /> neighborhood (even if it is a private one) lowers their property value ?A lot of people think that schools are objectionable. <br /> Why don't these objectors think that a very large (and somewhat unattractive too) building like the Art Center lowers their <br /> property values? None of their stated objections makes any sense in this situation. Or are we to think that private school <br /> children and chi chi art patrons are just more desirable in a neighborlhood than people with eating disorders? <br /> The rest of the"reasons" given are reprehensible, hysterical and just plain embarrassing. I am embarrassed to read the <br /> letters in the newspapers. Using terms like"mental illness", suggesting that the patients would be running through the <br /> neighborhood, going into homes and possibly injuring children, is juat over the top. I feel like I'm reading about <br /> neighborhood integration in the 60's. I really thought that we had pro'pressed form that intolerant era but I guess not. <br /> I would, lastly, like to point out that since this building has been a sc ool, then I would guess that for another school to <br /> move in they would just need to conform to the current school usag rules. What would the reaction of these people be if <br /> a charter/alternative school bought the site? You know, one for EB kids, or chemically dependent kids, or heaven forbid, <br /> disabled kids? I can't imagine. But, if that was a scenario, how would the council deal with it? If something like that was to <br /> come up, the real reasons for objecting would become clear to eveNone. Discrimination in any form is very ugly. I think <br /> the Emily Program will be a good addition to the Orono community and would probably be serving many people from the <br /> Wayzata/Orono area. I'd like to stay proud of our community. I wouli like people in the Twin Cities to know that we are a <br /> tolerant, accepting, progressive community and not a regressive backwater populated by small minded people who just <br /> happen to live in big houses. <br /> It is a shame that the big legal guns have been brought out to put pressure on our officials. I know that serving in local <br /> government is actually the most difficult service because of situations like this. I strongly urge you all to ignore the ginned <br /> up hysteria and emotional outbursts and approve the Emily Program s request. <br /> Thank you all for your service to our town. <br /> Debbie Lewis 952-473-4691 <br /> ( I have no personal agenda here- no relatives with eating disorders no one in the medical community, no one connected <br /> with The Emily Program etc. I am just a 23 year long citizen of Oron who is increasingly embarrassed by these news <br /> articles and letters in the papers.) <br /> I <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.