My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-11-1988 - Agenda Packet City Council - regular meeting
Orono
>
City Council
>
1988
>
04-11-1988 - Agenda Packet City Council - regular meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/12/2026 10:57:02 AM
Creation date
8/19/2025 2:01:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Administration
Admin Doc Type
Agenda Packet City Council
Section
City Council
Subject
regular meeting
Document Date
4/11/1988
Retention Effective Date
8/19/2025
Retention
Permanent After File Date
Protection
Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
341
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
6. The granting of the variances to create a walkout or a 3' terrace <br />level would result in the following violations of Section 10.08, <br />Subdivision 3 (A) of the zoning code with which the applicant must <br />first comply before the requested variances can be granted: <br />A. The property in question can still be put to its existing <br />reasonable use as a single family residence under conditions <br />allowed by the official controls, without creation of a walkout <br />basement situation. <br />B. The plight of the applicant in terms of his perceived need to <br />have a walkout excavation or a 3' terrace level is created by the <br />applicant, and has nothing to do iith any unique hardship related <br />to the land. <br />C. The variance, if granted, will alter the essential character <br />of the locality, by creating a significantly .artificially altered <br />lakeshore topography which other properties in the locality <br />generally do not have. <br />D. The granting of the requested variances would appear to serve <br />merely as a convenience to the applicant ;�s there have been no <br />valid hardships demonstrated through the review of this <br />application. <br />E. The granting of the application is not necessary for the <br />preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the <br />applicants. <br />F. The special conditions applying to the property in question <br />are not peculiar to this property and are typical of many <br />properties within the lakeshore areas of Orono. <br />7. The City Council finds that Option E of the staff recommendation <br />which includes a 3' high retaining wall at the top of the lakeshore <br />bank and regrading of the slope below that wall, is an acceptable <br />method of bank restoration, which in conjunction with adequate <br />vegetation screening will have the least visual impact on the <br />lakeshore in the general neighborhood, will be re'ztively equivalent <br />in stability to other potential bank restore: it thods, and is one <br />of the methods proposed by the Hennepin Soil anu water Conservation <br />District as an acceptable method of bank restoration. Additionally, <br />the Council finds that this method does comply with the requirements <br />of Section 10.08 Subd. 3(A). <br />Page 6 of 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.