Laserfiche WebLink
residential was done in order to limit curb cuts and traffic <br />generation on 15 that was anticipated if left as commercial. <br />(This was a typical strategy of the Council at the time.) In <br />light of this the Council may consider: <br />A. Rezoning of the property although this may have an <br />impact on the type of development that comes to the <br />property between lots and Bayshire lots which were <br />expected to be some type of low to moderate residential <br />density. <br />B. Leave as is. <br />It would be staff's position that there needs to be a <br />registrat.ion and awareness of these types of proposals and if the <br />current ordinance doesn't require such, then it be so amended. <br />This does not mean that the City should be in a position to <br />discourage such activity. Whether it is regulated under City <br />ordinance or not it does not prevent Mr. Penke's type of business <br />from being licensed by the County. <br />The issue of Mr. Penke's continued business on the site needs to <br />be addressed. Because of the fact that the zoning is a new issue <br />and Mr. Penke has been doing business on this site for three <br />years, it may be appropriate that the Council action to continue <br />it for at least 61 days pending the possible rezoning of the <br />property. <br />ALTERNATIVES - <br />Issue 1. Ordinance Regulation <br />1. Acceptance of infor:ation from the City Attorney or <br />ordinance interpretation. <br />2. Discuss what action the Council may want to take in <br />relationship to the existing ordinance. <br />3. Direct staff to amend ordinance to govern peddlers <br />and transient merchants. <br />4. Choose not to regulate, leaving regulation to <br />County. <br />5. Table. <br />Issue 2. Rezoning <br />1. Accept the information <br />2. Tahle for further consideration <br />3. Give a preliminary indication tr, the owner as to <br />whether it is fruitful to undertake a rezoning or not <br />2 <br />