Laserfiche WebLink
(These <br />are VERYI subjective, but help to establish <br />a relative impact for <br />each option.) <br />Factors And Relative Values <br />A <br />Visual Impact from Lake (Long -Term) <br />Least Intermediate Most <br />0 1 2 <br />B <br />Final Bank Stability <br />Good Not as Good Poor <br />0 1 2 <br />C <br />Short -Term Environmental Impact Using Proper Erosion - <br />Control Methods (Runoff water quantity and <br />quality) <br />Minor Impact Medium Major Impact <br />0 1 2 <br />D <br />Long -Term Environmental Impact -Runoff Water Quantity & <br />Quality <br />(Relative as compared to other options, based on amount <br />of flat <br />absorbtion area maintained) <br />Beneficial Neutral Detrimental <br />0 1 2 <br />E <br />Potential Short -Term impact if erosion controls are not <br />in <br />171ace. This is based on two factors: <br />E-1 Relative amount of dirt moved around on slope area <br />Little Medium Large Amount <br />0 1 2 <br />9-2 :relative amount of total disturbed surface area (s.f.) <br />Low Medium H !h <br />0 1 Z <br />K-3 Duration of work <br />Shortest time Medium Longest time <br />(Us- average of E-1, E-2, and E-3 fur E <br />factor, in place <br />of C <br />factor) <br />FACTORS TOTAL <br />AVERACL" <br />TOTAL <br />OPTION <br />A B C D A,B,C,D B-1 E 2 <br />E-3 B <br />A,B,D,B <br />A <br />0 1 1 4 <br />0 .33 <br />3.33 <br />1; <br />! 2 1 1 Z 1 <br />2 1.67 <br />2.67 <br />3 1 <br />2 1.67 <br />2.67 <br />1 �? 0 3 1 C <br />2 1.0 <br />4.0 <br />t 1 4 0 0 <br />1 .33 <br />3.33 <br />1 1 2 <br />1 1.33 <br />3.83 <br />1 4 1 2 <br />1 1.33 <br />4.33 <br />i 3.5 1 1 <br />0 .67 <br />3.17 <br />4 . `, 1 <br />1 . 6 7 <br />4.17 " <br />