Laserfiche WebLink
9187. 3 /O <br />TO: Mayor and City Council <br />FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrato <br />DATE: August 31, 1987 <br />SUBJECT: Highwood Roan Storm Sewer - Feasibility Study <br />Attachment: A. Storm Sewer Request - Highwood Dated 8/20/87 <br />B. Map of Anticipated Study Area <br />C. Storm Sewer Project Process <br />D. Proposed Highwood Storm Sewer Resolution <br />E. Letter to Residents Dated 9/l/87 <br />ISSUE - The Council to determine if they want to undertake the <br />necessary feasibility study for an approximate cost of $3,500.00. <br />Thq feasibility study would assist in determining if it is <br />appropriate for a storm sewer project to be undertaken in the <br />Highwood Road area. <br />INTRODUCTION - At the Council's August 24, 1987 Council meeting <br />Council at staff's request tabled the item until the Septemer 14, <br />1987 Council meeting. As noted in Attachment A some of the <br />residents in the neighbcr';ood have expressed <br />an interest in a storm water sewer study. (At present the size <br />of the district and number of property owners effected has not <br />been determined.) <br />DISCUSSION - While the storm of the mil lenium brought the issue <br />to a head particularly as it relates to Mr. Sauer's property, <br />(annotated on Attachment P) there is a problem in this area when <br />there is any 3 to 4 inch rain. <br />Intent of the feasibilit,- �;tudy is to determine; <br />.:�.) the extent of the poblem, <br />b.) the inadequecy of the current system if any, <br />c.) the cost of s ,-h a project and <br />d.) if the benefit-3 gained are worth that cost. <br />At that point it would be z:cpropriate that the City decide; <br />a.) if a project would be undertaken, <br />b.) if so, how ttiw project would be financeri, <br />c.) whether the C zy would be willing to participate, <br />d.) if once the cr;.;ts are known the people in the area <br />are still i.nterr�st:ef in the project. <br />The City does have recent r_;:oerience with property owners who <br />desire service, but who do ^mot feel that the cos of that service <br />is in direct proportion o` t:hr-ir benefit as .1idenced with the <br />Crystal Bay project. At in the sewer ation all of the <br />property owners do receiv;: Vim-. direct ben.-f.. For storm sewer <br />projects the usual methoA i- t.e determine a1, the persons in the <br />