03-28-1988 - Agenda Packet City Council - regular meeting

Home Browse Search

To: Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson From: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Admcihto rorV ��!!'' Date: March 10, 1988 0 ?0ND Subject: #1248 Thomas R. Williams, Jr., "4127" Oak Street - Variances - Public Hearing Zoning District - LR-lB Pertinent Ordinances - Section 10.24, Subdivision 5 (B) Lot Area Required = 43,560 s.f. or 1 acre Proposed = 24,400 s.f. .56 acres (additional 6,500 s.f. within Lot 1, Block 4, divided by unimproved platted right-of-way of Ridge Place) Variance = 19,160 s.f. or 43% Lot Width Required = 140' Adjacent or Road = 75' Variance = 65' or 46% Adjacent to Shoreline = 95' Variance = 45' or 28 List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Property Owners List Exhibit C - Plat Map Exhibit D - Council Minutes of 7/28/69 Exhibit E - Council Minutes of 7/10/79 Exhibit F - Original Survey Submitted With Application No. 460 Exhibit G - Updated Survey Submitted With Current Application Exhibit H - Map/Survey of Variance Applications Issued to Adjacent Properties Exhibit I - Map of Unimproved Right -of. -way of Oak Street Exhibit J - Hardcover Analysis Review of Application - The current application has been filed by the sole and legal owner of the property. The application involves a lot area and lot width variance and does not propose a formal building plan or profile. As in the 1969 and 1979 reviews, this is merely a variance review to allow the sale of the lot as a buildable lot. The approval should specifically provide the limitations for a future developer of the site. Staff is aware that this is a problem for members of the Commission where we are not dealing with a final plan of development and are merely asked to deal with the physical character of the site. The City has approved in the past lot area and lot width variances without formal building plans and has continued to do so even within the past few months. Review Exhibit G, the building envelope has been described on the updated survey noting the average lakesh�re setback lines, side setback and street setback for the principal structure. It should he noted that a building onvelope is also shown on the accessory lot divided by Ridge Place.. The average lakeshore setback line will be staked prior to Planning Commission inspection of the rite.