Laserfiche WebLink
Date Application Received: 07/23/2025 <br />Date Application Deemed Complete: 08/05/2025 <br />60-Day Review Period Expires: 10/04/2025 <br /> <br />To: Chair Bollis and Planning Commission Members <br /> Adam Edwards, City Administrator <br /> <br />From: Matthew Karney, Planner <br /> <br />Date: 18 August 2025 <br /> <br />Subject: #LA25-000035, Miller Dunwiddie Architecture, Inc., 880 Partenwood Road <br />Variance – Public Hearing <br /> <br /> <br />Background <br />The applicant proposes a single-story building addition and at grade deck on the lake side of the <br />existing home. The addition will provide living space for the homeowners on the main level. The <br />proposed addition encroaches approximately 8 feet into the average lakeshore setback (ALS), but <br />does not encroach into the 75-foot lake setback. The grade-level deck is proposed to be expanded <br />with the building addition and is permitted by City Code. The existing deck encroaches approximately <br />3.6 feet into the 75-foot lake setback and was an existing condition prior to the owners’ purchase of <br />the property in 1992. <br /> <br />Practical Difficulties Analysis <br />Applicant Submittal Information: <br />The applicant has submitted letters from both the applicant and homeowner, a survey, proposed site <br />plan, site photos, correspondence with Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, hardcover calculations, <br />and house elevations. <br /> <br />The applicant states that the house addition will allow for necessary and proximate access to the <br />garage for the homeowners. The addition was designed to meet the 75’ lake setback and is proposed <br />on a portion of the house furthest away from the OHWL. The applicant has provided a letter of support <br />from the nearest neighbor and their homeowner’s association’s architectural committee. <br /> <br />Planning Staff Practical Difficulty Analysis: <br />The angle of the house in relation to the lake resulted in the eastern edge of the house being situated <br />closer to the lakeshore than the west. The applicant has made an effort to reduce the encroachment <br />of the addition into the ALS, by proposing the addition on the west side of the house, further back <br />from the lakeshore. The adjacent neighbor’s letter of support, combined with the existing conditions <br />of the current home location, the existing landscape of the property provided screening, supports the <br />intent of the ALS that lake views will not be impacted by the proposed addition. The ALS creates a <br />practical difficulty for the homeowner with the limited building envelope and use of the home on the <br />property based on the existing conditions of the home. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Application Summary: The applicant requests approval of an average lakeshore setback <br />variance to construct an addition to the existing primary residence. <br />Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval of the variance. <br />89