Laserfiche WebLink
(lAB 9u5 ne59 Services Inc (►' ► Z <br />353, West %81h Street Suite 22 <br />Eden Prairie Minnesota 55344 i / II <br />Telephone 612-942-9818 ,'rlI I !{ ki0 J <br />draneh Office <br />March 1, 1988 <br />Mr. William Hull <br />2445 Woodhaven Drive <br />Orono, Minnesota 55356 <br />Insured: City of Orono <br />GAB File No.: 56527-11884 <br />Date of Loss: 10-9-81 through 9-24-87 <br />Par Mr. Hull, <br />I attempted to contact you both on Febriary 24 and 25, 1988, <br />concerning the decision of your claim against the City of <br />Orono for your septic system. <br />The St. Paul Office was contacted and your claim must be <br />respectfully denied in its entirety for the following <br />reasons. 1. The failure of the septic system to accept <br />the sewage flow appears to be a direct result of high <br />seasonal waters on the sight. This was not reported by <br />the Sight Evaluator. If he had recognized the seasonal <br />high water table you would have likely designed a Mount <br />System for the sight. The City accepted his reported <br />soil type and the design of the system was acceptatle <br />based on the soil type. The City cannot be held re- <br />sponsible for approving a system that met the code <br />requirements. <br />Secondly, it is our decision tnat the City should not <br />be held liable for the ultimate installation of a septic <br />system or its components that were noted on inspection <br />reports, but never followed up on. In addition to this, <br />we do not feel that the City should be held liable for <br />damages to the property resulting from a missing septic <br />system component. Lastly, it is the decision of this <br />office that the Cities only responsibility is to corr- <br />ectly report conditions that exist and require appropriate <br />repairs if necessary to a septic system. <br />