Laserfiche WebLink
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY <br />The League of Minnesota Cities annually publishes a "State of the Cities" report <br />to provide the public and policy makers with an on -going assessment of the financial <br />status of the 855 cities in our state. This year's report provides evidence that Minn- <br />esota's cities are continuing to face economic stress as they struggle to maintain <br />adequate service levels while coping with extremely large cuts in federal aid and the <br />prospect of diminishing assistance from the state. <br />The Federal Government is no longer a reliable financial partner in providing city <br />services. Its massive fiscal difficulties and a change in philosophy about inter- <br />governmental relations have caused a withdrawal of support for cities. As of 1987, <br />the Federal Government terminated its general revenue sharing program which had <br />provided Minnesota cities with over $40 million annually. <br />Minnesota's state government has struggled to fill the revenue gap caused by <br />federal funding withdrawal, but it too has had budget problems and has shifted its <br />budget priorities. Financial difficulties are partly responsible for limiting Minnesota's <br />ability to share state revenue with its cities. But changing budget priorities have also <br />led the state to dedicate a declining share of its budget to city aid. <br />Against this backdrop of dwindling resources, cities have had to deal with man- <br />dates and similar federal/state restrictions that are increasing the costs of providing <br />services and operating government at the local level. Mandates such as comparable <br />worth, fair labor standards, and wastewater treatment requirements have adversely <br />affected cities just as the 1986 federal tax act imposed new restrictions on cities' <br />revenue -raising abilities. <br />The main findings of this report, summarized by Chart 1 on page 2, are: <br />• Federal aid to Minnesota cities has declined 48 percent in real dollar <br />terms over the 1978-86 period. <br />" Minnesota's state government has been unable to substitute through <br />the local government aid and other property tax relief programs for the <br />federal assistance which cities lost over the past decade. State aid in <br />1986 stood at a level only slightly higher --3 percent higher in real <br />dollars-- than it was in 1978. <br />City spending cannot be blamed for iarge increases in property and <br />other local taxes. As of 1986 (the latest available State Auditor's data), <br />per capita city spending in real dollars was one percent below per capita <br />city spending in 1978. <br />• As further evidence of the budget rc3traints on cities, the total number <br />of city employees dropped a dramatic 24 percent between 1980 and <br />1985, more than three times the rate of decline in employment of any <br />other state or local governmental unit in Minnesota. <br />3- <br />