My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-22-1988 - Agenda Packet City Council - regular meeting
Orono
>
City Council
>
1988
>
02-22-1988 - Agenda Packet City Council - regular meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/12/2026 10:57:02 AM
Creation date
8/18/2025 10:02:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Administration
Admin Doc Type
Agenda Packet City Council
Section
City Council
Subject
regular meeting
Document Date
2/22/1988
Retention Effective Date
8/18/2025
Retention
Permanent After File Date
Protection
Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
374
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD JANUARY 27, 1988 <br />#1239 WILLIAMS CONTINUED <br />Cohen agreed with the Hommeyers and felt that the <br />application should be tabled to give the other property <br />owners the opportunity to comment on this critical <br />issue. <br />Bellows stated she did not like granting lot area and <br />lot width variances without a building envelope. <br />Mabusth suggested that Public Works Director Gerhardson <br />also attend the meeting to discuss the road improvement <br />issue. <br />It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Johnson, to <br />table this matter so that the affected property owners <br />are advised about the road improvement issue and given <br />the opportunity to comment. Motion, Ayes 6, Nays 0. <br />91240 NAVARRE DAIRY QUEEN <br />3574 SHORELINE DRIVE <br />COMMERCIAL SITE PLAN REVIEW <br />i VARIANCE <br />PUBLIC HEARING 7:56-8:09 <br />The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing <br />were noted. <br />Owner/Applicant, Rick Plaisted, was present for this <br />matter. <br />Jacobs explained that the original proposal included a <br />71x10' solarium addition to the south side, but has <br />since been omitted because of the inability to conform <br />with the rest room requirements. The proposal now <br />consists of on a drive-through/pick up station on the <br />west side. <br />Bellows felt it was inappropriate to review and make a <br />recommendation on this application without a landscaping <br />plan. <br />Jacobs noted that there have been several changes in the <br />plan and he has been in contact with the contractor by <br />phone from South Dakota, which has made it difficult to <br />solve some of the issues. <br />Cohen and Bellows felt that the application should be <br />tabled for staff to review the application without the <br />solarium addition (parking requirements, etc.) and <br />pending a landscape plan. <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.