My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-22-1988 - Agenda Packet City Council - regular meeting
Orono
>
City Council
>
1988
>
02-22-1988 - Agenda Packet City Council - regular meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/12/2026 10:57:02 AM
Creation date
8/18/2025 10:02:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Administration
Admin Doc Type
Agenda Packet City Council
Section
City Council
Subject
regular meeting
Document Date
2/22/1988
Retention Effective Date
8/18/2025
Retention
Permanent After File Date
Protection
Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
374
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
In general, Orono's policy has been to all(.: repairs to <br />failing systems by salvaging whatever components jai, be expected <br />to continue satisfactorily without jeopardizing the rest of the <br />system, and replacing system components that have outlived their <br />usefulness or would be detrimental to proper functioning if they <br />remained as part of the system. A typical septic system repair <br />will include the addition of drainfield using the existing tanks, <br />often adding a 3rd pumping tank when the drainfield needs to be <br />located uphill. Tanks in poor condition or located in high <br />groundwater areas usually are replaced with sealed, precast <br />concrete tanks. Approximately 1/3 to 1/2 of all repair jobs <br />include a pump system or re-routing of plumbing in the house in <br />order to place drainfield on higher, dryer ground. In general, <br />drainfield additions, when propos :�d, are required to meet a11. <br />standards of the code for location in suitable soils and soil <br />water conditions, and are sized based on standards for new homes. <br />In past cases where these standards were not met, some <br />replacement drainfields failed to function frcru the day they were <br />installed. <br />Over the last 3 years because this study was under4ay, the <br />City has allowed a number of "interim bas s" repairs to existing <br />failing systems in the Study Area, s that residents would have <br />the opportunity to avoid a high -cost replacement system that <br />would have to be abandoned in a few years if sewers became a <br />reality. <br />Given the lot area requirements, lot line and structural <br />setback requirements, soil permeability and water table depth <br />criteria, the sizes of douses, the topograph1 locations and <br />construction of existing systems and the location of existing <br />wells., the replacement of existi_. septic systems in Stubbs Bay <br />with systems that .weer the minimum acceptable code standards is <br />impossible on 28% of i. properties ar.7 is severely limited or <br />questionable can another 22%. Only 50% f the properties have <br />what could be considered as adequate area fcr replacement .-.d <br />permanent usag_� of septic systems. The most critical areas are <br />Crestview Avenue, Tonka Avenue, Eastlake Street, end Westlake <br />Street. <br />16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.