Laserfiche WebLink
AiLOttO CITY OF ORONO <br /> RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> y NO. 7607 <br /> l4kESHO <br /> existing improvements. The average lakeshore setback encroachment will not <br /> impact views enjoyed by the neighboring property. This criterion is met. <br /> B4."Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties." Economic <br /> considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. <br /> B5."Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight <br /> for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as <br /> defined in Minn. Stat. §216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter <br /> 78." This condition is not applicable. <br /> B6."The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under <br /> Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is <br /> located."This condition is not applicable, as improvements to a single-family home are an <br /> allowed use in the LR-1A District. <br /> B7."The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling <br /> as a two-family dwelling."This condition is not applicable. <br /> B8."The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such <br /> property or immediately adjoining property." The existing conditions of the Property, <br /> including the substandard size, existing location of improvements, and their proximity to <br /> the lake and wetland edge, topography, and vegetation, are unique conditions to this <br /> Property. This criterion is met. <br /> B9."The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the <br /> land is located."The existing home is in a nonconforming location. The proposal is to <br /> construct decks in a similar location and maintain similar setbacks. This criterion is met. <br /> B10."The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a <br /> substantial property right of the applicant."The setbacks impacting the Property overlap, <br /> eliminating any buildable area. The existing home is in a nonconforming location. The <br /> proposal is to construct replacement lakeside decks in a similar location and with similar <br /> setbacks. This criterion is met. <br /> B11. "The granting of the proposed variance will not in 1ny way impair health, safety, comfort or <br /> morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter." Granting the <br /> requested variances will not adversely impact health, safety, comfort, or morals of the <br /> community. This criterion is met. <br /> B12."The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but <br /> is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty."The variances allow for the construction <br /> 4 <br />