Laserfiche WebLink
occupied anc will require the �t occupants to be moved by a <br />specific date as outlined in esolutions. It shiould be <br />remembered that these resolutions do not necessarily require that <br />the b94 1ding be torn down, but that the discrepancies be <br />corrected in an expeditious manner or that tt: City will go to <br />Court to either have the structure repaired or removed. <br />ALTERNATIVES - <br />I. Ad ont an,,and all resolutions <br />2. ATrend and adopt <br />3. Table any or all the resolutions to a future meeting <br />4. Move not to commence action on any or all of t.' e <br />resr1 uti ons at this t i nm, as they do not meet the test <br />for hazardous buildings <br />RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended that all the resolutions be <br />undertaken to commence hazardous h• Sings proceedings. <br />PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by )nded by , that the City <br />Counri l _ .opt olutions # _ gh _ initiating hazardous <br />h,i 1<].ngs �,roceedings againQt the misted addresses together with <br />the required :_ecuring of the buildings it-, i reasonable period of <br />time and for any occupied buildings to be vacated. Ayes Nays <br />Cc ,mr J -Ubs, Building Inspector <br />Tom ,,af hn, Finance Direc' <br />