Laserfiche WebLink
Mike Hilbelink <br />85 Golden View nrive <br />Long Lake, MN 55356 <br />Z <br />CITY of ORONO <br />Post Office Box 660(.rystal Kay. Minnesota 5.ri3ZJeMunWpal Offie»s <br />On the NoW. Shore of Lake Minnetonka <br />December 22, 1987 <br />John Vogt <br />155 Golden View Drive <br />Long Lake, MN 55356 <br />Re: Site Evaluation for Proposed odivision <br />Gentlemen: <br />I have reviewed the information submitted as a site evaluation for <br />determining th; suitability of sites for on-si'.e sewage treatment systems <br />for your proposed subdivision, Application #1201. I wish to :Hake the <br />fol-owing comments and observations: <br />I. General comments. <br />A. Appearance and readability of report. <br />1. Cover letter contains the bare minimum information to be <br />considered as acceptable, but is generally inconsistent_ in <br />terminology (i.e. Lot III vs Lot 3; 30" vs 216"); typo's <br />corrected by hand or not corrected gives a shoddy look. <br />2. Tt,e same numerical inconsistencies hold throughout the <br />boring logs. <br />3. The lot diagrams are not to scale and the method of <br />reporting test hole locations is barely functional since no <br />bearings are given and locations are only approximate. Some <br />distances were omitted, hence the reader must make some <br />critical assumptions. Field inspection shows that some <br />measurements do not appear to be correct. <br />R. Content of report. <br />1. Relative boring elevations were not reported, and the <br />proposed configuration of mound or trench sites is not <br />shown; there is no indicated consistency in pert hole/boring <br />layout that would indicate the appropriate longitudinal axis <br />for mounds or trench systems. <br />at 11 1 VAI A l I\o: t' 1 ' ?s a ADMI%Is Ik � 1'I014 & 114411 7)3O 0 PUBUK' WORKS 471 7M <br />A441 �`Iti�. <br />