Agenda Packet Cc - regular meeting 1/11/1988

Home Browse Search

Zoning File #1201 January 6, 1988 Page 2 of 5 Lot Confirguration All lots meet the required lot width at the rear of the required front yard setback line. Each of the lots meets the required 2 acres of dry contiguous land as confirmed in Exhibit K and on the preliminary plat Exhibit L. Double frontage (through lots) have been proposed with this division. AlthOL Jh the Code suggests that these should be avoided, they are not prohibited. Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block 1 will not require variances. The applicants' surveyor has advised that through lots could not be avoided because of a need to place the spur road to the north in its present location and the reasons being there would have been a need to intersect a major drainageway isf placed further eastwara, major tree loss, and preservation of natural amenities for the proposed building sues. Per Section 10.02, Definition 42, both the street lot lines shall be front lot lines and per Section 10.03, Subdivision 10, a conditional use permit is required for all proposed accessory structures on these through lots. Staff has suggested that the applicants provide screening along the Old Crystal Bay Road side of these double frontage lots witr their lot grading/drainage plans and/or landscaping plans. The applicants have stated that they would rather leave this up to the future owners. Per Section 10.03, Subdivision 21, if these berms involve filling and borrowinc; t^ the property of more than 100 cubic yards of fill, a conditional use permit would be required for each site grading plans. At the December 21, 1987 meeting of the Planning Commission, the applicants were asked to realign the road (Outlot D) more to the south in order to open up the building envelope of Lot 6. The road has been realigned and the building envelope of Lot 6 has been greatly improved. Lots 1 and 2, Block 2, have retained their required 2 acres of dry buildable and additional soil borings to the south on Lot 2 confirm adequate septic area for expansion (review Exhibit I). Review Exhibit J, staff strongly recommends that the shared lot lines of Lots 5, 6, and 7 be realigned by moving the lot line further west so that open field area is maintained as part of the yard area for Lot 7. Yards of Lots 5 and 6 are divided by the drainageway within the defined wetlands area. The majority of the open field, classified as wetlands, is directly contiguous with the yard area of Lot 7. The addition of lan(i�, classified as wetlands will have no affect on the ability to divide Lot 7 at some future date but will reduce the potential of yet another lot line .rearrangement.