My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packet Cc - regular meeting 1/11/1988
Orono
>
City Council
>
1988
>
Agenda Packet Cc - regular meeting 1/11/1988
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/6/2025 10:14:45 AM
Creation date
8/12/2025 10:40:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Administration
Admin Doc Type
Agenda Packet CC
Section
City Council
Subject
regular meeting
Document Date
1/11/1988
Retention Effective Date
8/12/2025
Retention
Permanent After File Date
Protection
Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
398
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
the specials against the properties waived. <br />The County has agreed to accept the conditions B and C as <br />noted but are awaiting a final response. It is hoped <br />these will be finalized by January 11, 1988. <br />Continuation of <br />the <br />decorative lighting <br />style that is being put <br />in Mound would <br />cost <br />approximately <br />to be continued <br />from the <br />Spring Park border <br />_ <br />through County 19. <br />See Attachment <br />B, as to <br />style. This could <br />be financed either <br />by assessing <br />abutting <br />prcjerty owners <br />or through <br />the general tax rolls or a combination <br />of those. As <br />far as <br />possible actions <br />the City could <br />take in <br />relationship to <br />this <br />are the following: <br />1. Do nothing or defer the resolution to some point in <br />the future. <br />2. Install conduit etc. etc. in conjunction with the <br />project but not install the decorative lights at this <br />time replacing the present street lights with the <br />existing style. (The advantage to this is that the City <br />would save substantial cost by placing the conduit in <br />the ground now opposed to having to install it at a <br />later date but the project costs slated to replace the <br />existing lights could not he used to construct the new <br />ones.) <br />3. Install new lights in conjunction with the project <br />and use the project money slated for replacement: to <br />defray the cost of the new lights. <br />ALTERNATIVES - <br />Issue 1 <br />1. Approve attached as modified by the above listed <br />terms <br />2. Amend and approve <br />3. Table <br />RECOMMENDATION - <br />1. It is recommended that the Ccunci 1 approvp the <br />attached agreement which will be amended on the abcve <br />listed condition assuming acceptance by the County. If <br />not the City will brir,; back any material changes to thy, <br />1125/88 meeting. <br />PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , sec-nded by that the Council <br />adopt Resolution # and approve resolution terms for an amended <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.