My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-11-1988 - Agenda Packet City Council - regular meeting
Orono
>
City Council
>
1988
>
01-11-1988 - Agenda Packet City Council - regular meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/12/2026 10:57:01 AM
Creation date
8/12/2025 10:40:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Administration
Admin Doc Type
Agenda Packet City Council
Section
City Council
Subject
regular meeting
Document Date
1/11/1988
Retention Effective Date
8/12/2025
Retention
Permanent After File Date
Protection
Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
398
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
r <br />To: Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members <br />City Administrator Bernhardson <br />^•rom: Jeanne A. babusth, Building & Zoning Administrator <br />Date: January 5, 1988 <br />Subject: 01231 Olai Hanson & Florence Golden, 1380 & 1390 Railroad Avenue <br />- Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement :lass I - Resolution <br />Zoning District - LR-lA <br />Pertinent Ordinances - Section 11.03, Definition 65 (:.) and 66 <br />Application - Subdivision - Lot Line Rearrangement requirca by variance <br />application 01056, approved by Council on 9/14/87. <br />List of Exhibits <br />Exhibit <br />A <br />- Application <br />Exhibit <br />B <br />- Plat Map <br />Exhibit <br />C <br />- P,operty Owners List <br />Exhibit <br />D <br />- Council Minutes of 9/14/87 <br />Exhibit <br />E <br />- Resolution No. 2252 <br />Exhibit <br />F <br />- Survey <br />Review of Application - <br />On September 14, 1987, Council approved Olai Hansor's side setback <br />rariance, approving a 4.6" setback for a proposed detached garage (20' x <br />41). A building permit cannot be issued for the garage unti- both Mr. <br />E,anson and Mrs. Golden complete a lot line rearrangement with the City that <br />w)uld legally define the dividing line between their properties, thereby <br />ending a long bitter boundary dispute between the two parties. The current <br />application is the formal application of the lot line rearrangement <br />(review the enclosed survey, Exhibit D). Mrs. Golden (A + C) gains 0.87 <br />feet at the front of Parcel C and 1.05 feet at the rear. The existing <br />garage is now 1.2 feet from the new dividing line. <br />The Hanson's proposed garage at the northwesterly corner will be 4.6 <br />feet from the newly defined lot line and easily meets the required 6.4 feet <br />at tle northeasterly corner at 7+ feet per Resolution 2252, Exhibit F. The <br />old wire fence, probably the Golden's old fence, is now on Hanson's side of <br />the now line. This does not appear to be a problem as both property owners <br />are fi I I y aware of where the new lot line falls in relation to existing <br />impro�-ments but this is not a problem that the City need be involved with <br />at thi point. <br />Th ! average lot width of the Golden lot runs approximately 101 feet <br />and the Hanson's lot at an average width of 59 feet. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.