Laserfiche WebLink
To: Orono Council Members <br />From: Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Zoning Administrator <br />Date: October 24, 198'., <br />Subject: #910 James Hoff, 2056 Shadywood Road - <br />Conditional Use Permit <br />List of Exhibits <br />Exhibit A - Staff Memo of 6/4/85 <br />Exhibit B - Revised Survey and Soil Boring Results <br />Exhibit C - Lands pe and Grading Plan <br />Exhibit D - Pi ing Cummission Ming-L5 5/20/85 <br />Exhibit E - C -il Minutes 6/10/85 <br />This item was tabled at yc,ur June 10, 1985 meeting in order to <br />allow the applicant an opportunity to provide additional supportive <br />data regarding his request to regrade portions of his lakeshcre yard. <br />The applicant has submitted a report of soil borings performed by <br />Mark Gronberg which indicates that near the center of the lot at the <br />crust of the slope, up to 3' of fill was placed at some previous date. <br />A landscape plan by Lan -De -Con Inc. has been submitted which <br />indicates that the only area to be regraded will be the sharp crest of <br />the hill, or a strip approximately 35' wide across the lot, and <br />showing no grading closer. than 35' to the shoreline. The estimated <br />maximum cut area is 3' deep at the crest. <br />Note also that the landscape plan indicates the placement of new <br />trees and shrubbery where none exists now. The proposed stairway with <br />wood chip platforms will replace the existing 27" wide stairway. <br />Using a porous weed mat below the chips, theme is no resultant in- <br />crease in the minimal (1.5%) existing 0-75' hardcover. <br />This revised plan appears to be less extensive than the original <br />plan and disrupts a much smaller area of yard than was originally <br />proposed. Silt mats to prevent sediment from entering the lake can be <br />placed about halfway up the slope �0' hack from the lake. Staff would <br />anticipate no erosion problems with this new plan 3s long as proper <br />practices are adhered to. <br />As the Councilmembers stated in June, an engineering case could <br />be made on both sides of the issue of whether this project is a <br />benefit from a run-off standpoint. City Engineer, Glenn took, has <br />stated that the project will not be detrimental to the run-off <br />situwtion. Finally, noting that lowering the steep slope will tend to <br />make maintenance of the grassed siope less hazardous, staff submits a <br />draft resolution of approval for your review, incorporating findinqs <br />and conditions pertinent to the project.. <br />